Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yesterday we robbed Swansea with an offside winner, everyone and his dog seems to be saying that and yet I note today brighton had a late winner ruled out for offside and apparently 'that's the way it goes- tight decisions' OK it was two different stations but it was also 2 different teams.

Oh and while I am on, I heard Spit the Dog clearly say 'if we go on to win the league' as he co-commentated on the Dips v Fulham.
 
1101131.jpg

That’s incredibly close with the guy I presume is their left back.
 
I have only just caught up with the post match analysis on BT. Apologies if already commented on earlier in this thread but some of Hartson's comments were a disgrace.
 
If you look where the linesman is located on the far side,it is impossible to see through five people who are impeding his view.Therefore he can only (or supposedly) give offside if he is certain.Thankfully he didn`t guess.

Absolutely correct the linesman did not see an offside so can’t flag for it.

Interesting if VAR can’t see the ball how could they give offside?
 
If you look where the linesman is located on the far side,it is impossible to see through five people who are impeding his view.Therefore he can only (or supposedly) give offside if he is certain.Thankfully he didn`t guess.
I'd go further, he's actually in a great position (unusual I know), so looking across all of that he knows Sergio is onside, and has communicated such to Mariner through their intercom.

All we've seen to support "offside" is a very shit angle, but were there others we didn't get to see ?
 
The headline in the West Australian, reads “City survive by luck” and in the article “City were incorrectly awarded a penalty that led to the equaliser” and “winner from an offside position”. Whilst we may all agree on the offside call to state that we were incorrectly awarded a penalty is false. According to who?

The article will have been picked up from another source but the sentiment/narrative is alive and well down here too.
 
The headline in the West Australian, reads “City survive by luck” and in the article “City were incorrectly awarded a penalty that led to the equaliser” and “winner from an offside position”. Whilst we may all agree on the offside call to state that we were incorrectly awarded a penalty is false. According to who?

The article will have been picked up from another source but the sentiment/narrative is alive and well down here too.
Same here in NZ
 
How many years without a league title now?

Shall we shop for a flag? @gordondaviesmoustache
Can't we just approach the utd fan flag custodians and ask to buy all their old 'year counter' flags?
Reduce, re-use, recycle, n'all that?
I'm sure they will appreciate the 'joke' Just as we did!!
 

Looking at that the camera isn't in line with the back line or the linesman so how can the press say for sure it was off side. From this angle it looks close I would guess when viewed from the correct angle it looks even closer but that would spoil it for the press...
 
Looking at that the camera isn't in line with the back line or the linesman so how can the press say for sure it was off side. From this angle it looks close I would guess when viewed from the correct angle it looks even closer but that would spoil it for the press...
You mean the correct angle where the linesman is stood actually looking straight down the line of play.
If it’s such a travesty, the press should be getting on the backs of the FA as they actually had VAR last season at the Liberty Stadium.
 
You mean the correct angle where the linesman is stood actually looking straight down the line of play.
If it’s such a travesty, the press should be getting on the backs of the FA as they actually had VAR last season at the Liberty Stadium.

And (according to the papers) earlier rounds this season.
 
We spoiled their headlines for them. They had it all written, plucky underdogs beat moneybags City with cast off young player scoring the winner. Our penalty was a penalty all day long, just as much as theirs, just Sterling didn't do the full leap and dive like their player did. Aguero might have been fractionally offside but the rule is supposed to favour the attacker. Anyway the bottom line is.......fuck em!!
 
We spoiled their headlines for them. They had it all written, plucky underdogs beat moneybags City with cast off young player scoring the winner. Our penalty was a penalty all day long, just as much as theirs, just Sterling didn't do the full leap and dive like their player did. Aguero might have been fractionally offside but the rule is supposed to favour the attacker. Anyway the bottom line is.......fuck em!!
Exactly, fuck em all.
 
Looking at that the camera isn't in line with the back line or the linesman so how can the press say for sure it was off side. From this angle it looks close I would guess when viewed from the correct angle it looks even closer but that would spoil it for the press...


Look at the far horizontal line of the 6 yard box and then the front horizontal line of the 6 yard box are they in linement or does the far line line look like its yards further right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top