I haven't seen the original tweet yet - just the overview on Google (as I can't see Twitter in work).He hasn’t read it. I think he’s quoting someone who has and is saying there’s nothing in it.
The Mueller testimony isn't going to be very interesting. He'll say 'see the report' a lot. Agent Orange will parrot 'no collusion no obstruction' and wave his tiny hands.
I am at a loss as to what facts I've quoted out of context. It goes without saying what the job is of people in Congress. Of course, they can vote as they please. But others can point out how they've voted.
They voted against the bill because they decided anything that helps border patrolling hurts their overall goal. Which is to be Anti-ICE, Anti-Borders, and anti-border security.
So any appropriation that helps those things are a No No, even if it will also provide the relief that will prevent children from getting sick and dying. Sadly, dying children and children living in filth is better for their politics than money to relief such condition if that money also improves Border Security.
They are in fact doing the very thing many here have condemned the administration of doing. I.e. attempting to use appropriation as a tactic. Just like the administration is supposedly using 'separation' as a tactic.
However, unlike "separation'' there is no other practical value to attempting to withhold appropriation. Other than to increase the sufferings of the innocent for the purpose of personal propaganda. But if you know of any other practical purpose that I'm missing. I'm all ears.
But I digress. All this is for a different thread about politics in America, which I keep confusing this thread for. Only to be reminded this really isn't a thread about politics at all. It's a thread about bashing Trump.
We should start an American politics thread. A place for those who'd like to debate the actual facts, theories and ideologies of left, right and center American politics. But just like actual appropriation for Border expenditure, I'm sure it won't be popular.
it means they are against the existence of borders and the idea of immigrants.Who is "anti-Borders"? What does that even mean?
And this would be fine on points that are lies. But on points that aren't. That too should be fine to point out.This is a "Trump bashing" thread because most decent, law-abiding human beings don't like leaders who are amoral or immoral and don't like being lied to.
What I am trying to impart on you ( and more so others here) is that even while being angry and rightfully bashing, doing so with truth and facts are important. Or else all we'd have are a bunch of whining hypocrites. Only if you could get that into your through your skull. We'd all be better off, no?Get it through your skull: that is MORE IMPORTANT to many people than "policies" because its MORE IMPORTANT in our every day human relationships than what we "get out" of people.
Why is that so difficult to understand?.
So am I, I was just lamenting how unpopular such a thread would be.I'm happy to participate in an American politics thread.
it means they are against the existence of borders and the idea of immigrants.
And this would be fine on points that are lies. But on points that aren't. That too should be fine to point out.
What I am trying to impart on you ( and more so others here) is that even while being angry and rightfully bashing, doing so with truth and facts are important. Or else all we'd have are a bunch of whining hypocrites. Only if you could get that into your through your skull. We'd all be better off, no?
So am I, I was just lamenting how unpopular such a thread would be.
Trump is a uneducated bully. He panders to those who hang around with bullies for fear of being bullied. The idiots on here who defend him are trolls and should really know better. If the world were full of trumps then idiots would be walking into walls looking for doors.
Knowing this, then dissent and counterviews should not only be tolerated, it should be constantly sought.Who disagrees that truth and facts are important? Other than the President, I mean.
We ARE all a bunch of hypocrites. It's inherent in human nature; every person on earth by definition sees the trees not the forest because one's worldview is without exception constricted by space, time and biology.
The whining part depends on the person.
Knowing this, then dissent and counterviews should not only be tolerated, it should be constantly sought.
As for who else disagree with that truth and facts are important? You should read this thread.
And what the fuck exactly is that?Dissent and counter view conversations START with the basic premise that we operate at roughly similar stages of moral reasoning. If not, we are speaking different languages.
I have read the thread. Just not sure to what/whom you are referring. We've all accepted certain news items fed to us at face value and been wrong later when they proved false.
And what the fuck exactly is that?
Did you vote for him?It would be. And I doubt many would argue against that.
But as you can see from my response, my objection wasn't to what Trump was or wasn't.
Rather, I was objecting to the fallacious claim that nothing in the tweet was true. As that could not be farther from the truth.
I guess that depends on the questions he gets asked.
You can tell Trump is worried as they are trying to restrict what Muller is allowed to say.
I won't be watching, as it will just boil my piss with the constant interruptions and objections.I think they are a little worried, but just as much is posturing to pretend they control things.
I just don't think it'll be interesting.
I won't be watching, as it will just boil my piss with the constant interruptions and objections.
No. Gary Johnson.Did you vote for him?