Iniesta Vs Zidane

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Both supreme players.

If they were both in their prime now, City would take Iniesta; rags would take Zidane.

 

[KS55]

Both supreme players.

If they were both in their prime now, City would take Iniesta; rags would take Zidane.

City would take Iniesta, dippers would take Zidane, rags would take umbridge.

 

[Pell]

Very difficult to pick one, but Iniesta would suit City's play better than Zidane.

 

[bluemoon32]

Some absolute whoppers on this thread.

Iniesta was the better player.

Nah

 

[Onholiday(somemightsay)]

I'll be honest I'm still struggling to make my mind up on this one.

Certainly not as Straightforward as a lot of the ZZ tops are making it.........

 

[Paul1970]

So yesterday I posted that some folks on ragcafe thinks Pogba is as good as Zidane which I laughed at. But it got me thinking. If given a choice between Iniesta and Zidane, who would you say was better? Personally I would prefer Iniesta as I felt he was more consistent.

What say blues?

In my eyes ziizou is the greatest player of all time . I put him higher than messi Ronaldo etc

 

[Scottish Cityzen]

Zidane for me as he was an almost unique player. His poise and flexibility for a relatively tall midfielder made him stand out. He was a hugely influential player that could decide games on his own.

That said, Iniesta is/was an amazing player who perfectly suited the Barca style of play. I was lucky to see Iniesta a number of times and his partnership with Xavi and quality of play was phenomenal. Such a clever player who was miles ahead of the rest.

You wouldn’t be disappointed if we signed either of them.

 

[urban genie]

Viera was a better midfielder than zidan eand probably the best all round midfielder to have played for france.

So my answer has to be iniesta

 

[Corky]

Like comparing Megson and Sibierski.

 

[Onholiday(somemightsay)]

Like comparing Megson and Sibierski.

That's a whole new thread :-)