Donald Trump

[urban genie]

Putting this on againg



Seeing at the trump apologists skirted over and ignored @mat original posting of this, as then have no defence for trumps vile nature.

Thsi is what this **** is doing to America, dividing and debasing it.

 

[The blue phantom]

Surely it’s “I couldn’t give two fucks”!?!

If you could give fucks, then you care, obviously.

Never understood why Americans always get that the wrong way around.

This guy explains (3 mins):

I actually thought he'd just typed it wrong, watched the video and now realise they actually say it like that. I mean it just makes no fuckin sense.

 

[andyhinch]

I actually thought he'd just typed it wrong, watched the video and now realise they actually say it like that. I mean it just makes no fuckin sense.

Some it succinctly.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Surprised he lasted this long. Nunes must be in the frame for the job.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

The political equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?".

 

[SWP's back]

The political equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?".

Do they not libel laws over there?

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Do they not libel laws over there?

Unfortunately, opinion is not considered defamation, and First Amendment right are allowed to prevail.

Trump is pretty much free to express his opinion.

 

[buckshot]

Unfortunately, opinion is not considered defamation, and First Amendment right are allowed to prevail.

Trump is pretty much free to express his opinion.

Which is odd because one of his opinions is that people who aren't complimentary of him should be prosecuted.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

The guy who thought the Dem's were responsible for cooking up the 'Russian Hoax' is the perfect Trumper to become DNI.

 

[super_city_si]

Surely it’s “I couldn’t give two fucks”!?!

If you could give fucks, then you care, obviously.

Never understood why Americans always get that the wrong way around.

This guy explains (3 mins):

This is one ‘americanism’ that really boils my piss.

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

I know it gets tiresome, but I'll keep repeating it anyhow . . . the 2016 Presidential election was all about turnout, as the 2020 election will be.

My old man used to say 9/11 was a six-standard deviation event -- everything had to go right over multiple years for the hijackers to pull off their mass murder on the scale that they did. I kind of think the same thing may be true when looked at in retrospect about 2016, as much of this data makes clear. I am still convinced that so many putative Clinton voters just assumed she would win that they didn't bother to turn up.

If the young turn out, and if African-Americans turn out, whomever the Democratic candidate is wins in 2020. Will they, though?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...YKh424ak&noredirect=on&utm_term=.4ddf09483c00

 

[buckshot]

I know it gets tiresome, but I'll keep repeating it anyhow . . . the 2016 Presidential election was all about turnout, as the 2020 election will be.

My old man used to say 9/11 was a six-standard deviation event -- everything had to go right over multiple years for the hijackers to pull off their mass murder on the scale that they did. I kind of think the same thing may be true when looked at in retrospect about 2016, as much of this data makes clear. I am still convinced that so many putative Clinton voters just assumed she would win that they didn't bother to turn up.

If the young turn out, and if African-Americans turn out, whomever the Democratic candidate is wins in 2020. Will they, though?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...YKh424ak&noredirect=on&utm_term=.4ddf09483c00

People of color are key. Russians worked really hard to push the narrative that the Democrats were going back to white candidates and would be ignoring them. Many people of color didn’t vote or voted for Dumb Donald because they thought they were both the same.

We can be sure HRC wouldn’t be praising nazis or cozying up to Putin and Kim Jong Un. She’d also be giving larger tax cuts to the lower/middle and lower classes.

 

[Dax777]

Unfortunately, opinion is not considered defamation, and First Amendment right are allowed to prevail.

Trump is pretty much free to express his opinion.

Nope! Not true. Opinions are not immune to a defamation suit.

There is an absolute defense to such a law suit though. I'll leave that to you to figure out what that is.

 

[Dax777]

This is one ‘americanism’ that really boils my piss.

I couldn't care more :P

 

[SWP's back]

I couldn't care more :P

Stop it.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Trump is having a meltdown. He's now doubling down on his Twitter spat with Elijah Cummings by having a go at civil rights campaigner, the Rev. Al Sharpton.

"I have known Al for 25 years. Went to fights with him & Don King, always got along well. He "loved Trump!" He would ask me for favors often. Al is a con man, a troublemaker, always looking for a score. Just doing his thing. Must have intimidated Comcast/NBC. Hates Whites & Cops! https://t.co/ZwPZa0FWfN"

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 29, 2019

"Al Sharpton would always ask me to go to his events. He would say, "it's a personal favor to me." Seldom, but sometimes, I would go. It was fine. He came to my office in T.T. during the presidential campaign to apologize for the way he was talking about me. Just a conman at work!"

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 29, 2019

 

[SWP's back]

How is a president tweeting like that? It’s simply beyond mental. If someone had written a TV series where a president did this, it wouldn’t have gotten past the pilot as no one would have thought the plot believable.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

How is a president tweeting like that? It’s simply beyond mental. If someone had written a TV series where a president did this, it wouldn’t have gotten past the pilot as no one would have thought the plot believable.

Agreed. It's utterly absurd.

 

[mat]

Not liking the proposed design for his next rally.

 

[MillionMilesAway]

His other repetition today - after Sharpton/Baltimore/Sanders ranting - is the next attack on the Fed (didn't he appoint the boss?)

"The E.U. and China will further lower interest rates and pump money into their systems, making it much easier for their manufacturers to sell product. In the meantime, and with very low inflation, our Fed does nothing - and probably will do very little by comparison. Too bad!"

A few hours later:

"The Fed “raised” way too early and way too much. Their quantitative tightening was another big mistake. While our Country is doing very well, the potential wealth creation that was missed, especially when measured against our debt, is staggering. We are competing with other....."

"....countries that know how to play the game against the U.S. That’s actually why the E.U. was formed....and for China, until now, the U.S. has been “easy pickens.” The Fed has made all of the wrong moves. A small rate cut is not enough, but we will win anyway!"