United thread 2019/20

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Subsidizing him to play elsewhere. Oh dear.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/49491677

Inter Milan have agreed a loan deal to sign forward Alexis Sanchez from Manchester United.

Sanchez is thought to earn around £400,000 a week, a figure way outside of Inter's current pay structure, and it has been suggested United may subsidise his salary as part of a deal.
Click to expand...

I know he's been shit, as have Lukaku and Pogba, but every one they sell is another player they don't have to bring in if someone gets injured. Their squad looks pretty threadbare with talent.
 
Amazingly shit deal for them. 150k off the wage bill saves them less than 8m over the season, no loan fee and united are still paying him 350k a week, over 18m a year to not even be available for them. They’ve got martial Rashford James Greenwood lingard and mata as their attacking options. That’s utterly woeful.

Would love for a journalist to ask Sánchez if he regrets taking the money over City
 
ninjamonkey said:
Amazingly shit deal for them. 150k off the wage bill saves them less than 8m over the season, no loan fee and united are still paying him 350k a week, over 18m a year to not even be available for them. They’ve got martial Rashford James Greenwood lingard and mata as their attacking options. That’s utterly woeful.

Would love for a journalist to ask Sánchez if he regrets taking the money over City
Click to expand...

If they have injuries up front they will really struggle. I am shocked they sold lukaku without replacing him
 
worsleyweb said:
If they have injuries up front they will really struggle. I am shocked they sold lukaku without replacing him
Click to expand...
Not me sir. When it was noted by Ogden (a shitstain but one who sucks utd arse as we know) said they had a 100 million to spend i thought that sounded right. I then saw the idea that they had the Adidas money to spend only, this was 75m i think. Looking at the Glazer's model, the hat fit to perfectly that they would not be in a hurry to replace him. I took the position when Lukaku was off they had no intention of signing anyone else. A lot related to the Sanchez deal. That really messed up their books.
 
abu13 said:
This is a question that should be getting raised more often, a £50+ million player who can't get into that shambles of a midfield.
Click to expand...

Scheduled his wedding after the Copa America (he didn’t even get called up).
Got married and went on honeymoon.
Back at the swamp now, but missed preseason and is playing catch up on fitness.
 
I'm With Stupid said:
Subsidizing him to play elsewhere. Oh dear.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/49491677



I know he's been shit, as have Lukaku and Pogba, but every one they sell is another player they don't have to bring in if someone gets injured. Their squad looks pretty threadbare with talent.
Click to expand...

BBC and 400k a week lol. And the rest. Trust BBC to quote a lower wage than the 500-540k a week reported in many other media outlets
 
Sanchez signing for Inter on loan with the rags paying more than £200k per week of his wages still.

Here's a pic of the bullet we dodged:

main-qimg-44466159593a536d649390b0fa929f3f
 
Lukaku and Sanchez purchased with such fanfare that they were going to bring the glory days back. Now quietly ushered out of the door you’d be gutted if you were an Inter Milan fan having to watch them two show ponies. Then again you’d be gutted if you were a rag having to watch the club they’ve both just left.

I’ve never seen a club quickly write off player signing so quickly Sneijderlin, Fred, Sanchez, Lukaku, Micky Terrapin, Matic. All bought with significant outlays one season and gone or trying to be pushed out of the door the next.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top