Prorogation - Judgment Day:10.30am Tuesday 24/9/19

Gaudion M said:
Papers tomorrow:

Independant - Watson attacked by Cobynistas in farcical conference speech
The Times - Watson attacked by Cobynistas in farcical conference speech
The FT - Watson attacked by Cobynistas in farcical conference speech
The Gaurdian - Watson attacked by Cobynistas in farcical conference speech
The Mirror - Both leaders should resign!

The Sun - "Free Tommy" Watson taken hostage by marxists at Party Conference
The Star - EU loving Judges scupper our Bozza!

The Daily Mail - Traitor Judges - EU takes over our judiciary. No Deal now!
The Daily Express - EU What? Europhile judges destroy democracy.
Click to expand...
 
Boris has called a friend on how to deal with a crushing defeat....

watford_manager_quique_sanchez_flores_looks_on_before_the_premie_1343981.jpg
 
Hamann Pineapple said:
"You can come back to the park another time, but tomorrow you have to go to work"
EFOT0N8XUAUnzV1
Click to expand...
'I can fix this Bozzer. I've paid a momentum lunatic to stab Tom Watson and shout "I did it for you great leader" to be broadcast live around 14:00"
 
Chris in London said:
The Supreme Court said this case is a one-off so it is very unlikely to happen again, but in the future when the Government decides to prorogue parliament it will probably only do so for clear and easily demonstrated reasons
Click to expand...

Sorry but that doesn't really answer my question. My question simply regards what the law says about prorogation. If the law has no stipulations regarding prorogation then all of it would logicly be up to parliament, but then the very fact that it came to the courts is because there are legal requirements attached to prorogation over which the judiciary has the independant power to rule over right?
 
FlemishDuck said:
Sorry but that doesn't really answer my question. My question simply regards what the law says about prorogation. If the law has no stipulations regarding prorogation then all of it would logicly be up to parliament, but then the very fact that it came to the courts is because there are legal requirements attached to prorogation over which the judiciary has the independant power to rule over right?
Click to expand...

What the Supreme Court has decided is that the power to prorogue Parliament is one that the court can review. However they will not review it if the government had a good reason for proroguing parliament. On this occasion, they found it didn't.
 
The perfect fumble said:
He's in New York.

Downing Street has sent out a message for all Tory MPs to keep their mouth shut.
Click to expand...

I've said on here many times that BoJo is not loved by many Tories. How much support do you think he has right now within the party hierachy?

They are on the verge of an election so I don't expect anyone to make a move but this has to be worse than many of them thought and the kind humiliation that May suffered is what lies in store for BoJo even assuming he wins an election.
 
The perfect fumble said:
He's in New York.

Downing Street has sent out a message for all Tory MPs to keep their mouth shut.
Click to expand...
I'm just waiting for one to break ranks.

"I was told by Cummings that if I spoke up he would expose my sexual fetish of being sat on by naked fat women with various fruit and vegetables I eat from inside them. Considering the current state of this country that is now considered normal..."
 
Gaudion M said:
That is not part of our constitution, any government that can command a majority can sidestep it.
Click to expand...

Plainly it is part of our constitution. It governs when parliament is dissolved. You are right to say it can be circumvented by another act of parliament, but so can any other part of our constitution. If an Act of parliament abolishes the monarchy, we're a republic notwithstanding that we've been a constitutional monarchy since the seventeenth century.

That's what sovereignty means.
 
1.618034 said:
Has anyone from the EU stopped laughing/drinking long enough to comment yet...?
Click to expand...

I'm sure Bojo's hard landing will have reverberated, thing is we can also roughly calculate the consequences from this for what regards the expedience of brexit...

Spamming rolleyes over it all would be a more apt i guess
 
Mike D said:
Very funny and @worlseyweb what are you going to tell us next it's okay for Johnson to break the law because he was doing it to honour the result of a non binding referendum.
Click to expand...

You think it is acceptable that mps are refusing to act in the interests of the majority who voted in the largest referendum vote ever in this county?

I don’t find that funny in anyway.
 
Gaudion M said:
I've said on here many times that BoJo is not loved by many Tories. How much support do you think he has right now within the party hierachy?

They are on the verge of an election so I don't expect anyone to make a move but this has to be worse than many of them thought and the kind humiliation that May suffered is what lies in store for BoJo even assuming he wins an election.
Click to expand...

I'm buggered to know what happens next.

Surely he can't try prorogation again? My guess is he'll get back and Parliament will force him to request an extension.

But he can't do that.

Maybe he'll retire to his ditch and resign?

In truth I haven't a clue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top