B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Both sides need to have a veto. I think I tried to explain this before.
They do. Both able to vote yes or no.
Both sides need to have a veto. I think I tried to explain this before.
Only if the EU erected one.Quick question. If we left with no deal at all would we have a hard border between the two Irelands ?
You do miss the main point(s)Yes but they offered this to May in 2016 and she sounded out DUP and Tory opinion and the likes of JRM called it “cretinous”, due to NI being in a separate agreement.
I’m not saying it’s the same as May’s, I’m saying it was offered by the EU in 2016.
This isn’t anything Johnson has done, other than make concessions and take it.
£33bn.Anyone know what our settlement bill is, no change there in this deal?
It's a done deal NI does pretty well if they see it free trade with the EU and any and all future deals made by the UK include them.Steady. You don’t want to oversell it.
Slightly off topic but just heard that arch brexiteer and full time ****, John Redwood, is apparently MP for a heavily remain constituency.
It does raise the terrifying spectre of a fortified hard border like the Norwegians Swiss have. Can't see that working.
You do miss the main point(s)
Yes - the Irish Sea option was there years ago - so fucking what!!
Since then the EU has secured the all-UK unfettered backstop - far far better for the EU and, in particular Ireland, than this deal - so they have now had to go back to a previous good position - rather than a:
"Utterly fucking wonderful position that fell in their lap and was the best ever thing they could hope for"
Yep - Robbins and May were that shit
Top tip - if you ever find yourself having to do serious negotiations (not just the admin) - delegate upwards or downwards
Only if the EU erected one.
You wouldn’t get near. There’s three or four from here fighting over it already.Congratulations on once again scrolling back through pages and pages and missing the actual discussion.
My point was that I’m not going to wank Johnson’s dick off for him bending over and going for something offered by the EU 24 months ago.
If "compromising" means caving in completely to a position that Theresa May said was, "Something no British prime minister could ever accept". Then, yeah. It's a compromise.In some ways, the Benn Act was boris' biggest blessing. It forced him off a pigheaded no-deal dick swinging fight into compromising to the EU offers. But he has got a deal, even if it was already on offer, and that does deserve recognition.
You are preaching to the hard of being willing to look in a mirror and 'fess up to being wrongTo be fair, and I'm not blowing smoke up his arse here, he came into power something like 100 days before the 31st October deadline. Granted, that's a deadline that he set himself but 100 days was never going to be enough time to come up with something completely fresh so it was always going to be a re-hash of May's deal or a resurrection of some other deal.
Some MPs obviously worried about no deal may support him to get this over the line but once it's done the electorate might like to hand this poisoned chalice on to someone else.
And you reckon you know about negotiations. Don’t make me fucking laugh.You are preaching to the hard of being willing to look in a mirror and 'fess up to being wrong
They all gave him absolutely no fucking chance whatsoever of achieving what has been achieved
And of course......
They now cannot bring themselves to 'fess up that they were wrong when he has achieved far more than they forecast could be achieved - so shallow
Personally I think Johnson is a bit/lot of a **** - I do not have a great deal of time for him
But, I can admit that he has achieved things that people gave him no chance of achieving
That so many on here cannot man up and do the same - IMO - speaks more about them than Johnson
FFS man up you guys
All delivered by the Conservative and Unionist party .....If "compromising" means caving in completely to a position that Theresa May said was, "Something no British prime minister could ever accept". Then, yeah. It's a compromise.
What it definitely does, is compromise our union.
Brilliant.
Slightly off topic but just heard that arch brexiteer and full time ****, John Redwood, is apparently MP for a heavily remain constituency.
This is potentially a route to no deal.
Then Benn Act requires a lawful agreement to be put to Parliament to avoid having to ask for an extension.
This agreement could satisfy the Benn Act, get voted down by Parliament (likely) and lead to a no deal exit.
Except the proposed WA is unlikely to be lawful as it will contravene Section 55 of the Trade Act 2018 which prohibits a British Government treating any part of the UK differently in terms of trade and regulatory framework. This amendment was drafted by non other than the ERG.
Court action is being initiated to prevent Johnson bringing an unlawful WA before Parliament.
I posted about this many pages back but it was lost in the detritus of this thread (as well this post may be)
It is also worth pointing out the the Withdrawl Act 2018 set out procedures and time frames for both the Lords and Commons to properly scrutinise any agreement. This cannot be complied with given the time frame.
There should be an extension but Johnson will do anything to avoid 'dying in a ditch'.
Well doneMP's didn't get a say on EU trade deals so what has changed.
We will elect the MP's who do have a say.