Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bet some of your wives and girlfriends are going to be gutted when this is over and you’re not chained to this thread 12 hours a day. It’ll mean they will have to talk to you again, and none of them really want that...
Have you been talking to my wife?
 
It is the job of Her Majesty's official opposition to oppose the Government and hold it to account. If the Government of the day tries to sidestep and bamboozle Parliament they have to always be opposed otherwise we become an elective dictatorship and the PM can act without impunity.

If Johnson had been more open and transparent, he may have well have got his deal through, but acting like he did it did not surprise me he was opposed because MPs simply do not trust a word that comes out of his mouth. The way he acted with the letters just shows his arrogance and childishness, why on earth would people support a PM who acts like he does.

Johnson is trying to turn the whole charade into a people v Parliament battle, that is dangerous, its the actions of a despot. I don't like Johnson at all, I think he is the wrong man for the job, he is arrogant, he lies and he is a narcissist who has made it all about him. I get you don't like Corbyn and I think Corbyn has played it wrong too. I posted the other night I thought it might be a good idea for Labour to support the deal, but if Johnson is still trying his little games then he has to be opposed. This is bigger than one man, and he is a man I am not even convinced is in favour of Brexit, he is just using Brexit as a means to end. That end is him being re-elected with a proper mandate, because it is always about him. He doesnt care about the country, he cares about Johnson.
Saying I don’t like Corbyn is a slight understatement..I wouldn’t piss on him if he was on fire... shoot me
 
I have got the feeling this could be another Bercow moment again tomorrow by refusing to let Johnson have the vote on his deal tomorrow. When you have Gove trying to pull the No Deal stunt on MP's to try and bounce them into vote for it https://www.theguardian.com/politic...exit-contingency-plans-operation-yellowhammer

There needs to be a proper debate full scrutiny including the economic impact and of course any amendments just we did on May's deal.
 
Rabb admits workers rights are not enshrined in the bill on Marr.

If you're not in a union, get in one and organise. Should this bill pass it will be bonfire on any protections/rights we still have.
We don’t have much anyway Osbourne had a good go at that back in 2011 when he extended the period of when an employer could bin you off for no reason to 2 years. People keep voting for those horrible twats, they never learn.
 
I have got the feeling this could be another Bercow moment again tomorrow by refusing to let Johnson have the vote on his deal tomorrow. When you have Gove trying to pull the No Deal stunt on MP's to try and bounce them into vote for it https://www.theguardian.com/politic...exit-contingency-plans-operation-yellowhammer

There needs to be a proper debate full scrutiny including the economic impact and of course any amendments just we did on May's deal.

ANY exit from the eu will be a disaster for years before it starts to benefit us and you would expect that when every fibre of our country has been entwined in the eu for around 40 years! What do people expect all smooth and easy?!
 
ANY exit from the eu will be a disaster for years before it starts to benefit us and you would expect that when every fibre of our country has been entwined in the eu for around 40 years! What do people expect all smooth and easy?!
That's simply not correct.

How will it be "a disaster" if trade continues as before? With no tariffs it extra paperwork, there will be zero immediate effects. Of course it's not a bright idea and yes over time we'll all be worse off. Yes some investors may decamp and it it's a bad idea all round. But "disaster"? Hardly.
 
Why did the Government not want the deal scrutinized??
Exactly,i don't get why people are crying the deal didn't get voted in when it's not been looked at properly,there will be traps in there,things boris can change and nobody could do anything about,you wouldn't sign a legal doc without reading every word so why would they vote it through
 
ANY exit from the eu will be a disaster for years before it starts to benefit us and you would expect that when every fibre of our country has been entwined in the eu for around 40 years! What do people expect all smooth and easy?!
Lots of people did, which is absolutely fucking insane when you stop to consider it.
 
Exactly,i don't get why people are crying the deal didn't get voted in when it's not been looked at properly,there will be traps in there,things boris can change and nobody could do anything about,you wouldn't sign a legal doc without reading every word so why would they vote it through
He's not fucking evil, Karen.

"Traps in there", FFS.
 
He's not fucking evil, Karen.

"Traps in there", FFS.
He is a proven liar with no respect for the queen or parliament,he tried to goad everyone into calling an election to try and force no deal through,that was a massive trap,no-one in their right minds would trust him and vote a deal through before the contents are made legal

When do we get the dying in a ditch bit? he did promise
With tyler commentating,and it's live..
 
Everyone is concerned about Government traps, but surely there is as much a likelihood of EU traps for Brexit supporters to be cautious about and to want to consider.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top