You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Last Film You Saw
- Thread starter FantasyIreland
- Start date
mancitymick
Well-Known Member
1917. Utter shite
Bait is brilliant. Looking forward to Parasite as it’s had great reviews.I would also like some thumbs up/thumbs down for these three that are on my to-watch list:
Bait
1917
Parasite
Richard Jewell
Decent 7/10
Watched Richard Jewell last night.
Very good, enjoyed it a lot. Utter c*nts the lengths the FBI took to try and incriminate him in the bombing.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Watched Richard Jewell last night.
Very good, enjoyed it a lot. Utter c*nts the lengths the FBI took to try and incriminate him in the bombing.
I have a problem with this film. Much like a lot of Eastwood films of late, there's a lot of holes.
All it says is he didn't make the phone call.
What kind of argument is that? It doesn't prove anything.
I thought Sam Rockwell was extremely wasted in the role, but Paul Walter was superb as the main lead.
Inconsistent film.
GX Blue
Well-Known Member
I have a problem with this film. Much like a lot of Eastwood films of late, there's a lot of holes.
All it says is he didn't make the phone call.
What kind of argument is that? It doesn't prove anything.
I thought Sam Rockwell was extremely wasted in the role, but Paul Walter was superb as the main lead.
Inconsistent film.
What about the fact they arrest someone else and they admit to doing it. Doesn’t that prove his innocence as well?
I have a problem with this film. Much like a lot of Eastwood films of late, there's a lot of holes.
All it says is he didn't make the phone call.
What kind of argument is that? It doesn't prove anything.
I thought Sam Rockwell was extremely wasted in the role, but Paul Walter was superb as the main lead.
Inconsistent film.
History vs Hollywood.....Richard Jewell
http://www.historyvshollywood.com/reelfaces/richard-jewell/
Bigga
Well-Known Member
What about the fact they arrest someone else and they admit to doing it. Doesn’t that prove his innocence as well?
The FBI aren't obliged to admit wrongdoing unless directly implicated in framing someone...
The point is Jewell could conceivably have had an accomplice who made the call. All the film shows is somebody put down a bag and Jewell had a "feeling". Why?? Does he explain the 'feeling'? Why was he in that neck of the crowd along with an adequate amount of protection?
So, it's not that I believe he wasn't 'innocent', but I put to you the film doesn't explain why he was, enough.
Being unable to be at two places at the same time is circumstantial, not 'proof'.
The point is Jewell could conceivably have had an accomplice who made the call. All the film shows is somebody put down a bag and Jewell had a "feeling". Why?? Does he explain the 'feeling'? Why was he in that neck of the crowd along with an adequate amount of protection?
So, it's not that I believe he wasn't 'innocent', but I put to you the film doesn't explain why he was, enough.
Being unable to be at two places at the same time is circumstantial, not 'proof'.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Thanks for that.
That was an interesting read up comparison, but it does essentially back up my point of it being poorly made and especially the capture of the real bomber.
This film just leaves you with more questions than answers.