You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Investigation in Liverpool's 'hacking' of our computer systems
- Thread starter Franny's toilet roll
- Start date
The FA told Pompey they wouldn’t get one (fact). Then when Pompey found out there was nothing in the rules preventing them; they were out of time.
Due to debt to other clubs, which was morally correct. Glad we don't have to go there again the way they treat away fans, prefer Liverpool to them at a push, no sympathy for the penny pinching tin pot club.
nmc
Well-Known Member
Due to debt to other clubs, which was morally correct. Glad we don't have to go there again the way they treat away fans, prefer Liverpool to them at a push, no sympathy for the penny pinching tin pot club.
Despise that 'Play up Pompey' song
northwichblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 2,079
Scouse Bastards
If that’s the answer what’s the question...Scouse Bastards
Despise that 'Play up Pompey' song
Yes it is shit, however they will belt that out on mass, the whole ground, can't call it a stadium, that and "blue army," monotonous but effective as like I said the whole place is singing it, getting behind the team. Now what place in Europe of Portsmouths got taken by the Dippers ? That club Pompey was not penny pinching, it was being run onto the ground and being bled dry.
Old Satchel face Harry Redknapp did not help with his spending then behaved like a Dipper, was not his fault.
Dippers need to brought down several pegs or a lot more.
Daniel Taylor’s article in The Athletic gives a good pretty good, balanced view of this imo. Namely that City will regret accepting the £1m settlement, and would’ve done things differently if it happened now, given the animosity between the clubs. Liverpool obviously relieved to get away with a pretty serious offence relatively lightly.
GITS !Daniel Taylor’s article in The Athletic gives a good pretty good, balanced view of this imo. Namely that City will regret accepting the £1m settlement, and would’ve done things differently if it happened now, given the animosity between the clubs. Liverpool obviously relieved to get away with a pretty serious offence relatively lightly.
Daniel Taylor’s article in The Athletic gives a good pretty good, balanced view of this imo. Namely that City will regret accepting the £1m settlement, and would’ve done things differently if it happened now, given the animosity between the clubs. Liverpool obviously relieved to get away with a pretty serious offence relatively lightly.
There are many things City are exceptional at, there are many things they are absolutely horrendous at.