UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm glad he said something but the production of that video was a bit weird, panning to shots of all the great things the club has done felt a bit propaganda-ey.

Cant believe they couldn't find someone from independent media to ask the same softbakk questions though, someone like Lineker would have loved to sit there and ask those same questions for the BBC.

Why would we trust any of the media? It all gets twisted.
 
I'm glad he said something but the production of that video was a bit weird, panning to shots of all the great things the club has done felt a bit propaganda-ey.

Cant believe they couldn't find someone from independent media to ask the same softbakk questions though, someone like Lineker would have loved to sit there and ask those same questions for the BBC.

And then they would have edited it and twisted it as they wanted
 
I'm glad he said something but the production of that video was a bit weird, panning to shots of all the great things the club has done felt a bit propaganda-ey.

Cant believe they couldn't find someone from independent media to ask the same softbakk questions though, someone like Lineker would have loved to sit there and ask those same questions for the BBC.

I think that was very important & he made he point about the negative under tones that they have to deal with.

not many know what they’ve done for Manchester.
 
Well UEFA have broken the "Pinch" agreement they came to with us in 2014 that was supposed to draw a line under the whole affair, so it would be no surprise to me if we were to go to a Swiss court over that. Especially as UEFA went through our sponsorship arrangements in fine detail between 2012-2014.
We want our money back that paid as part of that pinch.
 
I'm glad he said something but the production of that video was a bit weird, panning to shots of all the great things the club has done felt a bit propaganda-ey.

Cant believe they couldn't find someone from independent media to ask the same softbakk questions though, someone like Lineker would have loved to sit there and ask those same questions for the BBC.

That interview would have been run past legal and probably edited numerous times as a result. You can't do that with external media and the risk would be too great to not have final control over the output.
 
Key part of the interview for me is this.

"They relied more on out of context stolen emails than all the other evidence that we provided about what actually happened".

That screams out to me about the email saying ADUG should supply the Etihad money which we now know didnt happen because the money came from the EC.

We know Leterme has a habit of just ignoring evidence he doesnt like without explanation (like the 5m valuation of PSGs qatar sponsorship).

If he did something like only accept the (out of context) email saying ADUG funded Etihad as fact, that would make us guilty to him even if the club had "irrefutable" evidence otherwise.
 
Very happy with that message. Exactly what needs to be said and doubling down on our stance.

If we are still found guilty by CAS, we are in a very difficult place. The club has been so strong that it is innocent, to then be found guilty by an independent body, who then do you believe.

Until then, I believe my club and what it is telling me and anyone assuming guilt at this stage knows as much as I do, which is f all, about the facts. It is just their opinion/prejudice
 
Good to hear that. We've taken some heavy (and dirty) blows in the last few days, and it feels good to see someone at the very top of the club fronting up, and aligning the support.
 
Have the premier league released any statements regarding the uefa ban or know how they stand on the matter? From the point of view of other clubs with ambition (think the panel named Leeds and Sheffield wed as examples) they must think what the point of trying to get in to the premier league and Europe if you then have to compete with one arm behind your back while the select few can do what you want. Plus will it put any future investment in premier league product at risk because people might not want to invest in teams like Newcastle. Or are the premier league keeping quiet because like uefa they are protecting the few rather than looking after the game has a whole.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top