denislawsbackheel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 May 2008
- Messages
- 25,452
- Team supported
- We went to Rotherham…
Wouldn’t it be easier for him to learn to read?
I am a big fan myself of the radio output,6 radio,4 extra,radio 1 and on the sounds app I get loads of podcasts and not having to listen to a single advert is just fine by me.I don’t mind it either and given the output, local radio etc it’s an important part of the national fabric of this country that helps bind it together.
I am a big fan myself of the radio output,6 radio,4 extra,radio 1 and on the sounds app I get loads of podcasts and not having to listen to a single advert is just fine by me.
So now it's a "moral" thing that we keep paying for a "service" the majority of people don't want or no longer support?
And it is a majority, otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation, would we. But then there's the issues "YOU believe it's madness" to want to get rid of the licence fee. It's not the 1950's, there is more choice and many people don't give two figs about the BBC and the licence fee. You know what they do care about? Being at risk of a criminal offence for not paying to support ONE institution that they disagree with which serves very little purpose in a world of choice. Many people don't want to pay a charge just for watching TV anymore. If the majority voice wins out and the licence fee is scrapped, who are you to force them to continue to pay for something the collective does not want?
Because you want them to pay for BBC programming for you. That's the reality of the situation. Would your concern be as strong if the licence fee meant you could continue watching ITV content for free, for example?
You believe that it is not a public service, it is a public a service that many in the country benefit from having.
There are issues with the current funding model, I'd personally prefer incorporating the cost into our income taxes.
What I want is for everyone to pay towards the BBC that provides a necessary public service with programming for everyone (that includes you and me). That's the actual reality of the situation.
And I don't. You said recently that ITV was shit. That's your opinion. If the licence fee was scrapped and the "public service" was made ITV, would you be advocating that channel as a "Public service" instead?You believe that it is not a public service, it is a public a service that many in the country benefit from having.
There are issues with the current funding model, I'd personally prefer incorporating the cost into our income taxes.
What I want is for everyone to pay towards the BBC that provides a necessary public service with programming for everyone (that includes you and me). That's the actual reality of the situation.
Wouldn’t it be easier for him to learn to read?
They do not provide anything that other broadcasters don't.
I dont see why I have to pay a licence feeYou believe that it is not a public service, it is a public a service that many in the country benefit from having.
There are issues with the current funding model, I'd personally prefer incorporating the cost into our income taxes.
What I want is for everyone to pay towards the BBC that provides a necessary public service with programming for everyone (that includes you and me). That's the actual reality of the situation.