Good to read a nicely balanced post.The measures taken so far include the education element which is more important than anything else.
Our office never had alcohol hand sanitisers but it does now. Our company never considered home working but now it is.
Really healthy people are only doing the above to stop the spread to others and not to stop themselves getting it.
If we close everything down then the spread will slow which is great. But, the virus will resurface as soon as the doors are reopened which makes it pointless.
The only reason for a lockdown at the moment is to slow infections so that the NHS can gain control but unlike in Italy the NHS has not lost control nor is it swamped.
In an ideal world we'd infect everyone who is healthy on purpose, give them 2 weeks isolation and then that would probably get rid of this thing for good.
If a vaccine becomes available then that will do the exact same thing, it will give you the virus so your body can fight it and in the future not become infectious to others again.
So many people just seem to want to find fault - some maybe simply because of their political bias and others driven by frustration to a simple desire to find fault without offering any sensible alternative actions - but this is/should be way beyond that. I do not read many constructive posts like this one.
As you sensibly say:
"If we close everything down then the spread will slow which is great. But, the virus will resurface as soon as the doors are reopened which makes it pointless."
So is closing schools a sensible step? To isolate the generations that are the most likely to be unharmed and cause a major challenge to the other, more vulnerable, generations? As parents still need to work - often it will be grandparents taking up the task of caring for the kids and therefore being in greater risk
There are not easy answers - hard decisions will have to be made - and perhaps our government actually is just following the recommendations of the medical and scientific experts? - rather than just falling to the temptation to just 'pull stunts' - which may be the case in other countries that have closed schools in a seemingly 'knee-jerk' reaction.
In these countries that have closed schools - when do they reopen? - what would be the criteria that needs to be achieved for such an opening to be justified? It surely be a long time before related deaths and infections are less than currently.
So is closing schools a sensible step? To isolate the generations that are the most likely to be unharmed and cause a major challenge to the other, more vulnerable, generations? As parents still need to work - often it will be grandparents taking up the task of caring for the kids and therefore being in greater risk
There are not easy answers - hard decisions will have to be made - and perhaps our government actually is just following the recommendations of the medical and scientific experts? - rather than just falling to the temptation to just 'pull stunts' - which may be the case in other countries that have closed schools in a seemingly 'knee-jerk' reaction.
In these countries that have closed schools - when do they reopen? - what would be the criteria that needs to be achieved for such an opening to be justified? It surely be a long time before related deaths and infections are less than currently.
Last edited: