Oh right. Like u say, thought something else had happened. It was hardly an exclusive. I thought it popped up on the CAS websiteThink he means Breaking news from last night,I couldn't find any updated Breaking either
Oh right. Like u say, thought something else had happened. It was hardly an exclusive. I thought it popped up on the CAS websiteThink he means Breaking news from last night,I couldn't find any updated Breaking either
Oh right. Like u say, thought something else had happened. It was hardly an exclusive. I thought it popped up on the CAS website
This is the big one. Am i wrong to think that rob harris breaking the news is a sign that this isn't going to end well for us?
What if it’s misplaced confidence though. Where does the buck stop. There’s an awful lot riding on this.I'm confident in Khaldoon's confidence.
Love the optimism, but i can't see anything else than continued accusations and insinuations, regardless of how the verdict goes. It is just a thing to do, and they will kerp doing it no matter what the outcome is at cas.
What if it’s misplaced confidence though. Where does the buck stop. There’s an awful lot riding on this.
That would be the sweetest victory of them all but I'm sorry there's a part of me that says we'll be disappointed again and that's the mentality I'm running with. Think there may well be a few devastated people here in July.
Evans has just said on talkshite that uefas evidence comes from us not the football leaks
But when I went to school - in the days of pens and ink wells - it was drummed into us that "U" ALWAYS followed "Q".I have to say your post is appalling. The discussion to this point has been intellectual and interesting and you have brought it down to this piece of illiterate nonsense.
Don't you know it should be be " who gives a qfuck?" with a question mark on the end?
Punctuation is everything on this forum
:-)
But when I went to school - in the days of pens and ink wells - it was drummed into us that "U" ALWAYS followed "Q".
So shouldn't it be "Who gives a fquck?"
Says who?That’s not how it works.
When libels start to rear their head news publications go very quiet and very quickly around the subject matter in question.
What you have to remember is that we don’t challenge. Rarely. We keep things in house and keep our counsel. We invite the press in for prawn sandwiches and earl grey tea. We be the bigger man 99% of the time.
However their comes a point when you draw a line. It happens all the time. This is our line now. If we are exonerated in this, then the first publication to level cheating at us is going to get a different response this time.
Evans has just said on talkshite that uefas evidence comes from us not the football leaks
I was surprised when I heard that , but it’s him so no surpriseOh they going with the mislead angle hey even though Uefa looked at all the accounts and found nothing? So in reality the email hacks they relying on? We broke no Uefa rules.
Funny evens gets a lot of info whose the uefa Snith?
I hope you're right but we have made an art form of turning the other cheek.That’s not how it works.
When libels start to rear their head news publications go very quiet and very quickly around the subject matter in question.
What you have to remember is that we don’t challenge. Rarely. We keep things in house and keep our counsel. We invite the press in for prawn sandwiches and earl grey tea. We be the bigger man 99% of the time.
However their comes a point when you draw a line. It happens all the time. This is our line now. If we are exonerated in this, then the first publication to level cheating at us is going to get a different response this time.
That’s not how it works.
When libels start to rear their head news publications go very quiet and very quickly around the subject matter in question.
What you have to remember is that we don’t challenge. Rarely. We keep things in house and keep our counsel. We invite the press in for prawn sandwiches and earl grey tea. We be the bigger man 99% of the time.
However their comes a point when you draw a line. It happens all the time. This is our line now. If we are exonerated in this, then the first publication to level cheating at us is going to get a different response this time.
To have inside agents would require UEFA to suborn an awful lot of ppl.This is a dictionary definition of paranoia.
If I were to have any reservations at all it would be the CAS itself.
I have no doubt that UEFA have representation on the inside.
At the end of the day this is a battle for power, and money has driven this from the start and will do so right up until the end.
We will see how smart UEFA really are and where their fingers are and in which pies after this.
I don’t believe they have a case. They will proceed through this like they do with every case they have ever been involved with. Bribes. Money. Corruption. That’s how they roll.
I suspect that isn’t going to work this time.
They have met their maker.