Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Largely agree, but I have a different view of when and where the home straight is entered.

If we had left with a deal like May was putting in place - we have never left

If we have left but the accept the controls that the EU is seeking to 'impose' - we have only left to be enter a vassal state - I know that people do not like the use of that term but I feel it is apt.

If that occurs - and referring to my herd analogy from earlier - and as the EU will be able to ensure that an independent UK cannot flourish, the EU can be confident of a future vote to re-join - on their terms and that it will only be a matter of time before a vote is taken

Perhaps, but for me the UK has left and is now free to negotiate its own deals. Its success will depend on how well it negotiates with much stronger countries/blocks and indeed the rest of the world, but that was the temptation in leaving. Up to the government to deliver. :-)
 
That’s fair enough, I’ve always maintained that I’m pro European but anti EU, and despite what the likes of BK may say the two things are not mutually exclusive. It’s not beyond the realms of possibility that the EU doesn’t survive and if that happens and it is replaced with a European Community of nation states, I could see myself voting to be a part of that.

Seriously you couldn’t make it up. The EU is made up of 27 sovereign nation states.

 
By misrepresenting what people say, incorrectly inventing arguments others haven't made and arguing from that position?
You will note the several comments to you and other posters that display his self-appointed guru status, along with his need, presumably because his credibility has suffered severe erosion recently, to insult and demean, e.g.
…………...

Again I regret to inform you that your crippling lack of knowledge is proving to be a hindrance when posting.
……………..
Welcome to the real world. Are you guys ready because judging by some of the posts on here the ignorance is truly astonishing.
……….. You should try reading the UK proposal document. You might learn something. Or you can continue posting ill-informed nonsense. It’s your choice.
.........….also correcting your errors. Honestly I should get paid the amount of teaching I do on here.
@Saddleworth2 - just wondering if you are gaining any insights from the POV of balance - that is just this morning. Perhaps yesterday you should have quoted Bob and referred to me?

and @Mëtal Bikër this all after Bob's initial post this morning which was riddled with disingenuousness:
First off. The EU haven’t asked for an extension. Their calculation is that the time pressure will produce UK concessions as they did in the Withdrawal Agreement.

As I said - when you spot the technique it all becomes quite obvious - start of with a 'somewhat technically correct' statement - that the EU has not formally asked for an extension..... and then use that to build a load of nonsense around

The reality - easily proven - is that:
  • all the clamour/discussion/demands for an extension has been coming from Remain advocates
  • Barnier himself has been corresponding with UK Remainers stating that the EU is 'open to an extension of 2 years...' - but of course not actually asking.....PMSL
  • the UK has been the party that has clearly stated that they will not seek an extension and will refuse one if offered
  • re the bollocks of ".... Their calculation is that the time pressure will produce UK concessions....." all the commentary is that it is the UK using this ploy - and that being mentioned by Remainers desperate to secure an extension.....

The reality is indeed that the EU has not 'formally' asked for an extension - but the extent of their lobbying and briefing is getting quite close to them begging for one;-)
 
Last edited:
Seriously you couldn’t make it up. The EU is made up of 27 sovereign nation states.


For the time being, but as many MEP's have addressed (AND YOU!), in order for the "project" to work, more sovereignty must be handed over to the EU Parliament. Replace sovereign monetary and fiscal policies with an EU one, a European Defence Force, paid for by the EU taxpayer, to address concerns on "defence", and all hostile opinions on the EU to eventually be suppressed.

Those 27 sovereign nations will in time become 27 federal states. That is what the EU wants, it's not what it's members want, but those making decisions at sovereign levels are being replaced with EU sycophants who do, regardless of what the electorate of those nations want.
 
You will note the several comments to you and other posters that display his self-appointed guru status, along with his need, presumably because his credibility has suffer severe erosion, to insult and demean, e.g.


@Saddleworth2 - just wondering if you are gaining any insights from the POV of balance - that is just this morning. Perhaps yesterday you should have quoted Bob and referred to me?

and @Mëtal Bikër this all after Bob's initial post this morning which was riddled with disingenuousness:

As I said - when you spot the technique it all becomes quite obvious - start of with a 'somewhat technically correct' statement - that the EU has not forma;;y asked for an extension..... and then use that to build a load of fatuous bollocks around

The reality - easily proven is that:
  • all the clamour/discussion/demands for an extension is coming from Remain advocates
  • Barnier himself has been corresponding with UK Remainers stating that the EU is 'open to an extension of 2 years...' - but of course not actually asking.....PMSL
  • the UK has been the party that has clearly stated that they will not seek an extension and will refuse on if offered
  • re the bollocks of ".... Their calculation is that the time pressure will produce UK concessions....." all the commentary is that it is the UK using this ploy - and that by Remainers desperate to secure an extension.....

The reality is indeed that the EU has not 'formally' asked for an extension - but the extent of their lobbying and briefing is getting quite close to them begging for one;-)
It's like a desperation to be seen as "the reference point" on anything EU related. Sadly, the only impression he gives off when he rants about people being wrong or "ignorant" on the EU is...

 
You dont get it do you. I know more about the real world and how things happen than you thats for certain. You're best staying in your little world of doom and denial.

Challenge accepted!

Question 1. Is the UK asking for a trade deal with the EU like ‘Canada or Japan’?

Remember we do have access to your earlier answer.
 

As I said - when you spot the technique it all becomes quite obvious - start of with a 'somewhat technically correct' statement - that the EU has not formally asked for an extension..... and then use that to build a load of nonsense around

I do love the phrase ‘somewhat technically correct statement’. Otherwise better known as ‘correct’.
 
As should any democracy, I was also pointing out that the difference between us joining the EEC in '73 and the current EU and what it's become is like chalk and cheese. Had the EU admitted it was beginning to go too far, agreed that a major reform to it's purpose and future existance needed to be addressed, placing more emphasis on the importance of sovereign governments and less on the Euro Parliament, i'd have been more inclined to continue membership.

For now though, the aspect of trade and business should be our only relationship with the EU and the rest of Europe, IMO, with emphasis placed on co-operation and not an integration of politics. That for me is what killed any association I wanted with the EU.

I can understand that. The financial crisis brought closer integration and I can only see the looming economic crisis, which will be enormously painful for everyone, accelerating and intensifying that. Some will view that as a narrow escape, others rue it as a missed opportunity, but as you say it's important for us all to be neighbourly.
 
Those 27 sovereign nations will in time become 27 federal states. That is what the EU wants, it's not what it's members want, but those making decisions at sovereign levels are being replaced with EU sycophants who do, regardless of what the electorate of those nations want.

And this sadly is where you go wrong. The 27 nation states may or may not become 27 federal states but to do this they have to agree to become federal states and to agree many will have to put it the people in a vote as dictated by their constitutions. Many will put it to a referendum vote irrespective of their constitution as making such a big step without a popular mandate, and an overwhelming mandate at that, will likely end in tears.

I would also advise you to bin the ‘EU sycophants’ nonsense. It makes you sound unhinged.
 
I can understand that. The financial crisis brought closer integration and I can only see the looming economic crisis, which will be enormously painful for everyone, accelerating and intensifying that. Some will view that as a narrow escape, others rue it as a missed opportunity, but as you say it's important for us all to be neighbourly.
I was (still am) an advocate of joining the EFTA as for me it resembles a near perfect European relationship. I wouldn't even be against a Confederal Europe, so long as there was no £500 million "meeting house" filled with pointless MEP's, but that representatives of each member nations elected Government went to each sovereign centre of politics i.e. Westminster, Holyrood, Bundestag, Palais Bourbon etc. to discuss issues related to trade, with no member seemingly more dominant over another.

A "United Nations" of European Nations rather than the proposed "United States of Europe". It mainly comes dow to the fact that one MEP supposedly represents the voices and opinions of roughly 700,000 people! The bigger the politics of the EU gets, the smaller the voices of their electorate.
 
You do need to try and envisage how an independent U.K. will look in the future. You cannot say “I don’t like the look of all that integration” without having a scenario in your head to compare it with. After all it may well not be an independent U.K. in 5 years time but an independent England.
Sorry - I disagree - although I do not have an issue of envisaging an independent UK

It is entirely credible for me to see that there is a place that the EU is going that will be disastrous for me and my family and future generations - I do not want to go there

It is quite easy to envisage situations and conditions much more preferable to full EU membership

Back in 2015 - given a chance of moving to either EEA or EFTA status I would have leapt at it - as that would have been far better than being entrenched in the future EU maelstrom

In 2017-2019 - given the chance of being in the EU or the utter bollocks that was May's unfettered backstop - I would have chosen Remaining in the EU undoubtedly

In the here and now of 2020 - given the utterly wonderful prospect of actually being fully free of EU regulations - a situation beyond my long-standing wildest hopes - then I would embrace that future.

I would embrace it in the sure knowledge that any and all the difficulties that we will need to overcome in the future with regard to trade restrictions are fuck all when set against the future cataclysm that would have faced us if we had not been able to leave the EU

Every single chance to get a bit more certainty in our freedom from EU regulations and controls are a cause of huge celebrations for me - and fuck me - we are on the brink of an outcome beyond my wildest hopes of a few years ago. And the longer that the EU stays afloat the better because the more distance we can put between us the less the impact of the fallout.

The EU seeks controls over the UK for one reason only - its absolute need to prevent an independent UK being able to flourish just miles away.

Already, all the relaxing of state aid regulations as a result of the pandemic is a genie that will take years for the EU to get back in the bottle.

Not being able to back off some of its funding to the UK through securing a 2 year extension with contributions to the MFF and also, through such an extension during which it can control UK policies, being able to possibly lock the UK into a path back into the EU would be a major blow to the EU...

Seeing the UK able to set its own course free of EU controls is a situation that sends the EU anxiety levels up through the roof.
 
Last edited:
And this sadly is where you go wrong. The 27 nation states may or may not become 27 federal states but to do this they have to agree to become federal states and to agree many will have to put it the people in a vote as dictated by their constitutions. Many will put it to a referendum vote irrespective of their constitution as making such a big step without a popular mandate, and an overwhelming mandate at that, will likely end in tears.

I would also advise you to bin the ‘EU sycophants’ nonsense. It makes you sound unhinged.
Er, are we suddenly back to discussing brexit again? So the previous interactions were... pointless?

Again, i'm not "wrong", it is my "opinion" that this is where many in the EU wants to go towards based on the opinions of certain MEP's and nation member leaders such as Macron, Merkel and Varadker as examples, who support such an eventual federal Europe. So it's not "wrong", you disagree with my opinion, which is fine. You can do that, as can I. I'd advise against claiming that your "opinions" on the EU are facts; it makes you sound unhinged.

Would you also prefer "EU advocate" or "EU supporter" instead of "sycophant"? Is that less confrontational for you? Doesn't hurt your fee-fees as much?
 
No.

This is the way it works. You say something factually wrong or just plain stupid. I correct the factual error or point out why you are being stupid. You then respond with (insert random babble) and accuse me and others of (insert blathering nonsense). I go make a cup of tea.

We are now at the making tea part of the conversation.
@Saddleworth2 just wanting you to understand where Leavers draw some of their thoughts on the attitudes of Remainers from

Now go back a little while - we were starting to have a proper dialogue on this thread - you know - proper discussion

That is unwelcomed and must be distracted from

Anyway - I can see where the thread is going - and - as the prospect of healthy discussion on here is receding - time to go and ready the BBQ and perhaps check the beer fridge
 
Last edited:
Challenge accepted!

Question 1. Is the UK asking for a trade deal with the EU like ‘Canada or Japan’?

Remember we do have access to your earlier answer.

https://www.euronews.com/2020/02/19...rejecting-post-brexit-canada-style-trade-deal


There is no challenge pal. I live in the real world I know how things work. You couldnt negotiate your way out of a paper bag. Its deniers and appeasers like you that have draged this on for far too long.

By the way , I sugest you read my first post again? Rather than twist my words to suit your appeaser argument.
 
Perhaps, but for me the UK has left and is now free to negotiate its own deals. Its success will depend on how well it negotiates with much stronger countries/blocks and indeed the rest of the world, but that was the temptation in leaving. Up to the government to deliver. :-)
Well said - cannot argue with that - I keep mentioning my hope that the UK maintains resolve - but I am very nervous

Just thank fuck May and Robbins were fucked off
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top