Wayne, presumably?
I think youve misunderstood it maybe. His point is exactly the opposite of that; that there is never such a thing as just another missing white girl.Not sure that's entirely true in this case. For whatever reason the nation has had an obsession with the maddie case since it occurred in 2007. Rightly or wrongly, I'm not sure you can compare it to just another missing white young girl. Imo it was deliberate provocation.
That's what he's like, he says things for sensationalism.Not sure that's entirely true in this case. For whatever reason the nation has had an obsession with the maddie case since it occurred in 2007. Rightly or wrongly, I'm not sure you can compare it to just another missing white young girl. Imo it was deliberate provocation.
Definitely said sucked not fucked.
I hate Piers Moron, he is an awful human being. But I dont think saying that is totally wide of the mark to be fair. It is hard to argue against it; it is sadly true.
So he only changes his mind twice a year ? I would have thought that was OK really.
Do you think he is OK to actively encourage people to break lock down rules and risk lives?I often feel that people hate Piers Morgan and by default shit over whatever he says without any thinking and reason behind it. It was pretty visible from comments about his fight with Rudy Giulliani where many picked the side of that Orange Buffoon's **** just because Piers Morgan was on the other side.
He surely had and still has his cuntish moments, he is also an ultimate troll and gets easily under people's skin, but he is also very right in lot of fights he picks and I don't care if he picks them to stay in news and make gains for his career or if he does it because he really cares about them. Actually, some of the fights he picked, were not really great for his career but he picked them and never backed anyway. The one about guns in USA had cost him a top and very well paid job at CNN and he is smart enough and would have known it's not a popular topic in USA to talk about the way he did it back then.
He is controversial, some of the things he did in his life and career can't be excused, but I think he is useful person in media and public space, much more useful than no character cunts who lick arses of whoever is in power or are biased no matter what is happening in the world. He often opens good questions that wider society has to talk about to be better. And when it comes to things he really cares about, he doesn't give a shit who is on the other side. I like that. And I hate when people judge anything based on who said/did it, rather than what is said/done. It's OK when it comes to football and such relatively not important stuff, but when it comes to things that are important for the lives of ourselves and of our kids, it's pretty primitive way of thought.
I often feel that people hate Piers Morgan and by default shit over whatever he says without any thinking and reason behind it. It was pretty visible from comments about his fight with Rudy Giulliani where many picked the side of that Orange Buffoon's **** just because Piers Morgan was on the other side.
He surely had and still has his cuntish moments, he is also an ultimate troll and gets easily under people's skin, but he is also very right in lot of fights he picks and I don't care if he picks them to stay in news and make gains for his career or if he does it because he really cares about them. Actually, some of the fights he picked, were not really great for his career but he picked them and never backed anyway. The one about guns in USA had cost him a top and very well paid job at CNN and he is smart enough and would have known it's not a popular topic in USA to talk about the way he did it back then.
He is controversial, some of the things he did in his life and career can't be excused, but I think he is useful person in media and public space, much more useful than no character cunts who lick arses of whoever is in power or are biased no matter what is happening in the world. He often opens good questions that wider society has to talk about to be better. And when it comes to things he really cares about, he doesn't give a shit who is on the other side. I like that. And I hate when people judge anything based on who said/did it, rather than what is said/done. It's OK when it comes to football and such relatively not important stuff, but when it comes to things that are important for the lives of ourselves and of our kids, it's pretty primitive way of thought.
I hate him because he was in charge of a newspaper that hacked a dead child's phone.
I hate him because he used fake photographs to try and fuck over British soldiers.
I hate him because he doesn't give a fuck about anyone else, it's always all about him.
He's a ****. He's always been a **** and he will always be a ****.
And anyone who defends him is a ****.
He wasn't in charge of the NOTW at that time of the child's phone scandalI hate him because he was in charge of a newspaper that hacked a dead child's phone.
I hate him because he used fake photographs to try and fuck over British soldiers.
I hate him because he doesn't give a fuck about anyone else, it's always all about him.
He's a ****. He's always been a **** and he will always be a ****.
And anyone who defends him is a ****.
He wasn't in charge of the NOTW at that time of the child's phone scandal
http://westyorkscomms.co.uk/piers-morgan-did-not-hack-dead-girls-phone/
The **** likes bullying her.
In an ideal world we would have better political parties to challenge the Tories.He is a bully and has an awful style of journalism. His only redeeming quality is he will stick it to the Tories when others will not. In an ideal world we would not have inept tories in positions of power and we wouldn't have Piers Morgan ripping them to bits.