This is just going down a rabbit hole. Someone (with known sources) said Pearce was a witness, someone else said perhaps he was a crucial witness. I simply said I hope they are wrong because it would sway my confidence if our case was dependent on witnesses as opposed to documents.
So I have no idea what you are actually saying. If it's simply you believe City's evidence is "irrefutable" because that is what City say, great. That isn't my view.
Or terrible poker players and they think the hearing went well and it was a disaster.
Before July 10.
Grealish interest is real.
Simon Cliff made the alleged 'joke'. Without having to dig them out again what was so unprofessional about Simon Pearce s emails?
We still don't know how these emails came about being leaked BTW. If you want to be frightened about communicating via any electronic means then read the following:-
https://investigativejournal.org/qatars-hack-of-our-democracies/
Ha, I'm already dreading the day. Could really do with some advanced notice from CAS so that I can bump up the server in preparation. How about it Rui?If it goes against us there will be about a thousand posts in ten minutes which will see about 20/30 posters banned, if it goes for us the same amount of posts but only about 10/15 posters banned ;)