UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
No one is getting head off me, and I mean no one

When you were busy running the club into the ground after every home game me and my mates walked round to the main entrance and waited for a bit before getting a bus into town for opening time (5.30). One of my mates invariably roared 'Swales Out' for a laugh & made it into The Guardian as an 'obsessed individual' in one of their Swales articles
 
Surely as UEFA are based in Switzerland and it's regarding their competition that wouldn't be an issue? Not that I'd expect UEFA to do that by the way.
This is from section R46, page 21, of CAS’ Code of Sports-related Arbitration (in force 1 July 2020):

“The award, notified by the CAS Court Office, shall be final and binding upon the parties subject to recourse available in certain circumstances pursuant to Swiss Law within 30 days from the notification of the award by mail or courier. It may not be challenged by way of an action for setting aside to the extent that the parties have no domicile, habitual residence, or business establishment in Switzerland and that they have expressly

excluded all setting aside proceedings in the arbitration agreement or in a subsequent agreement, in particular at the outset of the arbitration.”

The next sections are also informative for this process.

As I said, there would need to be a fair amount of manoeuvring to allow for appeal of the CAS’ ruling to Swiss courts.
 
Our mate Tariq reckons both parties may only find out an hour or 2 before CAS announce it:


He's sort of wrong on that point.
A preliminary decision has been made that both parties now know about as they have to comment on it to the judges before the final judgement is handed down. The parties will know that decision 2 hours before hand.
 
Last edited:
That’s the one! Please don’t bring her back ;-)

joking apart mine is one year old this week, she is sharp as a whip, got the sock stealing down to a fine art, hoovering the pavement is a given and the deaf ear when being called when she’s off on one hunting down picnics in Heaton Park. Currently defluffing a tennis ball and not giving one fuck about CAS or anything
Ha - all too true. Ours is three now and has calmed down a bit. The sock thing is obviously a spaniel thing...
SF6DH17.jpg
 
Harris R s latest bellendery

If City have got off it will be on a technicality like the non admissibility of hacked e mails or the Court finding nothing wrong in City s conduct.

MGS and his University should refund his fees.
Harris is a disgrace really. He has consistently called this story wrong all the way through. He has swallowed every bit of leaked information from within UEFA for the past 12 months. He didn't challenge or check any of this information because it feeds into his own prejudices. Essentially he has been used as a puppet by the pro-Qatar camp within UEFA. He must realise by now that he has made a fool of himself and his employers. He knows the emails are admissable, that's already in the public domain.
 
Looking at some of the comments on Twitter and the Mail, it’s amazing how much people don’t know. All this ‘it’s the end of FFP’, ‘free reign for oil countries’ etc is total rubbish - the case isn’t about FFP, it’s about City’ books from 5 or 6 years ago. Absolutely nothing to do with the future of FFP.
All these c--ts wont is us banned there know nothing about the case or the actual charges they wont us banned to make Champions league nearly a cert for two seasons. Another who.should get it both barrels if we do win. Supposed to be a City fan but has totally sided with UEFA almost liable with his comments on how he thinks we cooked the books !
 
All these c--ts wont is us banned there know nothing about the case or the actual charges they wont us banned to make Champions league nearly a cert for two seasons. Another who.should get it both barrels if we do win. Supposed to be a City fan but has totally sided with UEFA almost liable with his comments on how he thinks we cooked the books !
Sorry forgot to post his name David Conn
 
Harris is a disgrace really. He has consistently called this story wrong all the way through. He has swallowed every bit of leaked information from within UEFA for the past 12 months. He didn't challenge or check any of this information because it feeds into his own prejudices. Essentially he has been used as a puppet by the pro-Qatar camp within UEFA. He must realise by now that he has made a fool of himself and his employers. He knows the emails are admissable, that's already in the public domain.

I don’t think he realises even now
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top