CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

BLUEBOY67 said:
Ian Herbert continuing to spout his bile - odious man. Hope we never let him near our club again !!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...ty-escaped-European-ban-no-moral-victory.html
Click to expand...

I have just got around to reading what this creep has written: City have been found not in breach of regulations because they refused to cooperate with the investigation so nobody could get to the bottom of what was going on?? THIS is published in a national newspaper? I think City fans need to take stock of just how deep and violent a hatred of our club has to be prevalent, when a reporter in a leading newspaper is confident enough to come out with not just a slur against our club but a dismissal of CAS and get it headlined. Utterly appalling.
 
cleavers said:
Perhaps we even conspired with him to do that ? Maybe he wasn't at those games to convince us, maybe we were convincing him to let us take it down ? It would seem a very high risk strategy that, because if we'd failed it would be a heavy loss financially.
Click to expand...

kalouk said:
I wondered about because he seemed to distance himself from it from the beginning. If he knew how weak the case was and knew it was a rushed hatchet job that wouldn't stand up in a court he may have been convinced that City would beat it. As you said maybe that meeting was convenient for both parties involved.
Click to expand...
I said earlier in the thread — and to date have not seen any evidence that would refute this theory — that Ceferin likely came to broker some sort of compromise and we politely told him **** off, at which point he likely responded with something to the effect of “Well now, that seems a bit hasty, can’t we... wait... actually, now that I think about it... never mind, carry on.” At that moment it was clear to City that he had parallel, longer-term plans to our appeal and realised our work could be very useful.
 
The Light Was Yellow Sir said:
I especially like the thick fucks, and I include professionals in there who really should know better, who are linking the ‘didn’t fully cooperate’ with certain issues being time bound thus suggesting that we’ve not cooperated to ‘drag it out’ thereby ensuring the time limits were breached.
This country really does need to invest in a much better education system as people seem unable to grasp concepts which are easier than simple. Unless there are suddenly a raft of job opportunities involving piss-boiling, they’re doomed....
Click to expand...
It's all they have left to cling onto and, once the CAS report is out, hopefully there will be nothing left for them and they will all crawl back under the rocks from which they came.
 
Colin Bells Boots said:
On the evidence of the number of posts which clearly have not understood the CAS decision, the fucking level of media/journalism is an absolute disgrace and shambles, littered with inaccuracy, outright lies and total bias.
Click to expand...
They're still trying to make out we're guilty when we've been exonerated on every main point.
 
kalouk said:
I wondered about because he seemed to distance himself from it from the beginning. If he knew how weak the case was and knew it was a rushed hatchet job that wouldn't stand up in a court he may have been convinced that City would beat it. As you said maybe that meeting was convenient for both parties involved.
Click to expand...
2 meetings in fact, one at home, one away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top