You clearly don't realise the all-knowing Vic and Bob are not to be contradicted in this manner. They'll probably report your posts :-)
This thread is like an alternative universe.
You clearly don't realise the all-knowing Vic and Bob are not to be contradicted in this manner. They'll probably report your posts :-)
Whilst you are correct, the point is that non-EU immigration was a factor for many Brexit voters. The fact that that their expectation that Brexit would help slow non-EU immigration was a fallacy doesn’t mean it wasn’t a factor in their decision making at the time, and it doesn’t change the fact that this view was reinforced by many Brexit supporting politicians.Well done, you've found a twat. Non EU immigration by definition has nothing to do with brexit or the EU.
To quote from the source you referenced:
‘As a newly independent trading nation, we will strike new trade deals with key partners across the world, open up new markets and make it even easier for our businesses to meet global demand.‘
How do we achieve this be putting up trade barriers with our largest export market and increasing red tape and administrative burden on our businesses?
Course it wasn’t. Listen to the UKIP councillor in the middle of this (5:20).
One idiot says an idiotic thing, but happens to have voted to leave and it's "OMG, brexit, amirite!?"Well done, you've found a twat. Non EU immigration by definition has nothing to do with brexit or the EU.
Well done, you've found a twat. Non EU immigration by definition has nothing to do with brexit or the EU.
And for many others, especially on this thread, it wasn't, but you only seem to want to focus and discuss those that did for some reason.Whilst you are correct, the point is that non-EU immigration was a factor for many Brexit voters. The fact that that their expectation that Brexit would help slow non-EU immigration was a fallacy doesn’t mean it wasn’t a factor in their decision making at the time, and it doesn’t change the fact that this view was reinforced by many Brexit supporting politicians.
That’s correct.One idiot says an idiotic thing, but happens to have voted to leave and it's "OMG, brexit, amirite!?"
It would be interesting to start having conversations on this subject again but it's clear some simply haven't moved on.
Stop making up fallacious arguments.And for many others, especially on this thread, it wasn't, but you only seem to want to focus and discuss those that did for some reason.
Stuck in this merry-go-round of "No, not everyone who voted leave voted on immigration... but some did... and those that did were lied to, and they helped leave win, so those votes shouldn't be counted, and we should stop brexit, and have another vote because without those votes leave wouldn't have won, and we wouldn't have left, and..."
It's. Tiresome.
So, leavers post videos which influenced us four years ago but we are seeing for the first time today? This is beyond mental illness.
Professor David Blake disagrees with youMy question was prompted by reading the link you provided and pointing out the gaping fallacy in the conclusion.
Currency fluctuations can help by making exports cheaper and hinder by making imports more expensive, although some exports will require imported materials so, personal opinion, currency fluctuations are a minor factor in the overall scheme of things.
Given you provided the link I assumed you would be interested in discussing some of its contents.
Professor David Blake disagrees with you
![]()
The UK is the Eurozone’s dumping ground - Briefings For Britain
The EU is following a classic 'beggar thy neighbour' strategy with its trading partners, in particular the UK, by exploiting the euro’s structural undervaluationbriefingsforbritain.co.uk
My point is that this sort of 'research' of extreme views is generally undertaken by extremists. My own 'flawed opinion' on the EU and brexit are informed my the mad extremist rants of the late Tony Benn and Michael Foot - I can post youtube links if you like?the specific Guardian video has been seen over 81k times, the anti Islamist rant 36k times - its your own fault if you choose not to research anything that continue to offer your flawed opinion on.
So is perpetual goading.That’s correct.
Maybe when you and your mates have something more interesting to say than we won you lost, it might be worth you joining in some of the discussions about what happens next. Until then I wouldn’t bother because perpetual gloating is boring and a bit sad.
the specific Guardian video has been seen over 81k times, the anti Islamist rant 36k times - its your own fault if you choose not to research anything that continue to offer your flawed opinion on.
No fallacies have been mentioned. You're apparently blind to your own behaviour.Stop making up fallacious arguments.
It’s tiresome.