itisrising
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 4,308
Very, very few players are 'complete'. We can view it as a weakness or, as I recall Gerard Houllier saying, a blend of strengths. If we play DS, Gundo and Rodri in a midfield 3, it is pretty clear that we have a weakness to a counter-attacking pace based team. Each player has massive quality but they do not complement each other. Play Rodri, BS and KDB and the difference is vast.
I agree that 'complete' players are hard to come by and it isn't even what should be demanded per se. We have the prototype in Fernandinho; that's the model of player that has been key in that role. What we're saying about Rodri is to cover weaknesses that have been fundmental to our defensive game for years; we need to cover his lack of pace, poor-average pressing game, ability to break up transitions, positioning, defensive reading of the game. All of which were attributes of Fernandinho's. So why exactly should the position be to cover his weaknesses as opposed to actually purchasing a player that has them as strengths? The key question is are Rodri's qualities for the side enough to offset his deficiencies?