A successful loan for Zinchenko could mean he becomes a £30-40m player by next season if he's given a spotlight at a big club (and in the Euros in the summer) playing in his actual role.
Would you prefer to sell him now for £15m, or wait a season and double it? I know what City would rather do.
It's likely bollocks anyway, but there is logic to loaning out a fringe player like Zinchenko - he's got 4 years left on his contract, so there's no fear of him running it down at this stage and him staying at City playing 1000 minutes in cup competitions isn't going to do anything for his value as a player.
We both agree on it most likely being bollocks. He's worth more than 15m now, he wont be worth anywhere near 40m next season. My point was more, send put a utility cover player on loan, that we are not looking to move on, and leave ourselves with a signing to make late on to replace him, while not getting the money for him to do so and still needting to free up his slot next year when his replacement has settled in. No use to us.