DrBlueBob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2008
- Messages
- 6,686
- Team supported
- Need you ask?
I think that he has said that this was something one of his constituents said to him.View attachment 5244
Awkward...
I think that he has said that this was something one of his constituents said to him.View attachment 5244
Awkward...
Clearly, if enough did it to change the outcome it would cause a constitutional crisis and absolute chaos, but would it stand? Presumably the Supreme Court would become involved and with the SCOTUS Trump team (Kavanaugh, Barrett and Gorsuch) on board anything could happen.That would make it interesting, but I can't see it happening.
If it does happen, then they may as well rip up their constitution (originally signed in 1787), as it is clearly not fit for purpose in the 21st Century.Clearly, if enough did it to change the outcome it would cause a constitutional crisis and absolute chaos, but would it stand? Presumably the Supreme Court would become involved and with the SCOTUS Trump team (Kavanaugh, Barrett and Gorsuch) on board anything could happen.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/st...members-not-bound-by-popular-vote-court-rules
Yes, I don’t really want him to concede. I’d rather see him undergoing the indignity of being physically dragged out of the White House at 12:01 on 20 January.even his own supporters know deep down, he has lost fair and square
I think Trump was hoping for some sort of uprising from his base, but it's just not happening.
He looks more desperate as each day passes. It's beautiful to witness his decline like this to be honest.
Agree, its a fitting end.even his own supporters know deep down, he has lost fair and square
I think Trump was hoping for some sort of uprising from his base, but it's just not happening.
He looks more desperate as each day passes. It's beautiful to witness his decline like this to be honest.
There was no convenient delay you fucking muppet. In California and Ohio, mail in ballots were counted in the weeks leading up to election night and thus, when they released their first of results, they showed in that count.
In the swing states, the republicans went to court to prevent early counting of mail in ballots. Thus on election night, the first votes counted were in person ballots, Trump led AND ONLY THEN did they start counting the mail-ins. That’s not convenient. It’s exactly how Trump wanted it to play out so he could claim victory. It’s exactly what we discussed in this thread during said court cases about early counting for two whole fucking months before the fucking election.
So don’t come into this thread with your poorly researched conspiracy theories and try and tell any other **** what is what as you’ll simply make yourself look an idiot.
Not Trump’s biggest fan, but in a post brexit era, he would be far better for the U.K. than Biden (who has dementia and won’t last two years). Harris is effectively President elect.
Yes, I don’t really want him to concede. I’d rather see him undergoing the indignity of being physically dragged out of the White House at 12:01 on 20 January.
This woman just got elected to the House of Representatives...
This woman just got elected to the House of Representatives...
This woman just got elected to the House of Representatives...
This woman just got elected to the House of Representatives...
Why do you assume I require your open arms or seek your approval? It's annoying. Simply here for the discussion.I read the article (as I do with any I post) and, as always, your interpretation is laughably shallow and entirely skewed toward your wish for the article to be “fake news”.
But, please, continue to WUM with sentences like your last. Really, please do. I am sure your grand return to the thread will be met with open arms.