COVID-19 — Coronavirus

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep, one reason being because they can't monitor and manage their own health. I get a cough or headache now? I wrap up warm, stay in bed. Eat well. If I feel short of breath, I call the doctor.

But people in that category might not be able to make the decision when to do any of that, or indeed actually take those actions. It's also worth noting that the drugs prescribed to some mental health patients are very delitirious on the body.

I also have to say it's a big misconception here that COVID is 'a respiratory issue'.

It's a virus that spreads from patient to patient via the respiratory system.

But once it has a hold on the patient, it can and does cause serious problems with just about any system or organ.

Immunological catastrophies, permanent neurological damage, loss of circulation, persistent heart, liver & kidney problems. Not bad for a cough.

Yep I get what it is but used respitory as that tends to be the view and just doing quick responses.

but having had depression and being dyslexic I can assure you they are not an issue in this case unless they are extremely severe.
 
I too let myself go too far at one point. I’ve got myself about half way back to being as fit as I was when I was a PT.

But we need that revolution across the entire country.
In March I was fittest I been even back when I was playing rugby but the classes never started after lockdown the pt guy did it on zoom but didnt suit myself

started CrossFit not feeling as fit but getting back to it and ending the year weighing less than start but more than April

on our street new housing esaste so young family’s amount of crap the kids snack on is untrue , we give our young one treats but always give her fruit for pudding and veg with meals
 
And what happens to their jobs while they’re locked away? How do companies go on without them?

I’ve got one mate who was born with one lung, otherwise a healthy 30something, but covid would be extremely dangerous for him. If he would have had to have been locked away throughout all this, he’d likely have been layed off. He’s got three kids. Who then feeds them? Where do they live if he can’t pay his mortgage?

Just imagine this multiplied by millions across the country.
The estimate is 20 million on the 9 groups of those at risk that need to be vaccinated first, as you say to protect all them , and the nhs would leave nobody to keep the country running, not least in the hospitals and care industry.
Protect the vulnerable and leave everyone to get on with it is an argument of the thoughtless and selfish that translates to I’ll be alright let me do what I want.
 
This is 10-20 million people.

It's not remotely possible. An attempt will result in hundreds of thousands dead and our healthcare overwhelmed. You need a different plan. Here's one:

1. Suppress the virus as hard as possible for a month. Like lockdown one.

2. Vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate.

3. Review and relax as fast as virus's spread allows.

If you don't fancy that, tier 4 everywhere instead of lock down. You'll probably end up locking down anyway, but might be able to get vaccinations ahead of the virus.

your solution is the same as mine, except crippling everything else in the process. The vulnerable are locked down in either case so you aren't providing any additional benefit. You're relying on a vaccine that's unapproved and which nobody appears in any rush to approve which says it all to get through everyone as a gesture, with no idea whether it will actually work or what adverse result you will create.

You're just panicky and vindictive and want something to be seen to be done to people, even though it is completely flawed and does nothing but to harm people still further.
 
I get what it is but used respitory as that tends to be the view.

but having had depression and being dyslexic I can assure you they are not an issue in this case unless they are extremely severe.
I guess I'd say that there's an awful lot more out there than those conditions.

But you know, even moderate depressive episodes do sometimes result in people exhibiting a shocking lack of self-care - not washing, eating properly, drinking fluids. Not seeing a doctor, no exercise, no social contact, easy to not realise you are possibly ill. Plus hormones and stress levels can be affected in a significant way. It could add up to a pretty bad series of circumstances for someone with a virus like this.
 
I do understand why they were built but, considering none have been used as yet (including zero beds) and we have NHS staff seemingly now telling admitted patients without Covid that they are "safer at home" then it seems like they were a PR exercise to me, with no contingency or emergency planning playing any part whatsoever.
I GET the need for them, I'm just failing to see any real utilisation or thinking outside the box.
Maybe you are privy to that info, in which case I'll give you the floor..... ;-)
If you can survive at home, then they want you out of the hospital.
They are also acutely aware that X number of staff managing Y number of ICU beds should be happening, but they are currently running at different ratios eg X/2 and y*2, meaning you have a worse case of surviving on ICu now, because they can’t watch/fix the increased numbers to the previous level of care.

why is this hard to understand?
the more you put in icu hospital, the thinner the care spread, the less optimistic outcomes.
 
England hospital data over the Christmas weekend:

24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / TODAY

Patients 18, 227 / 17, 701 / 18, 350 / 19, 277 / 20, 426

That is up 2775 since Christmas Day.

18, 974 on 12 April was the most in the first wave. So we broke that record on Sunday.


Ventilators 1427 / 1437 / 1498 / 1556 / `1641


That is 214 up and 204 of them since Christmas Day.

England last had that many on ventilators on 12 May.

Because of better treatment fewer now go on ventilators so we are not near the wave 1 record high we had on 12 April. But a lot closer than we would like. It was 2881.


The cases are worrying enough but this dramatic rise in hospitalisations is even worse.

Will post the regional split in a moment.
 
If you can survive at home, then they want you out of the hospital.
They are also acutely aware that X number of staff managing Y number of ICU beds should be happening, but they are currently running at different ratios eg X/2 and y*2, meaning you have a worse case of surviving on ICu now, because they can’t watch/fix the increased numbers to the previous level of care.

why is this hard to understand?
the more you put in icu hospital, the thinner the care spread, the less optimistic outcomes.
Ok, I'm not wumming here (and maybe being a bit thick), but why were the Nightingales built and then not used??
 
I guess I'd say that there's an awful lot more out there than those conditions.

But you know, even moderate depressive episodes do sometimes result in people exhibiting a shocking lack of self-care - not washing, eating properly, drinking fluids. Not seeing a doctor, no exercise, no social contact, easy to not realise you are possibly ill. Plus hormones and stress levels can be affected in a significant way. It could add up to a pretty bad series of circumstances for someone with a virus like this.

yep it’s a massively varied field but all get counted as a comorbidity on the general stats which is not good.

ons stats are best as they only go by death certificate which should be more accurate.
 
There's so many dicks about at the moment that I'm just ignoring them myself, way more important things to worry about.
Sadly you can’t ignore them.

they are causing the issues to the everything but covid health of the nation.

and then bleat about the reduced level of care of everything but the covid health of the nation.

ie selfish - blame the govt, others, the old, the kids, China, bill gates, Biden, but not take responsibility for their own actions.
 
Ok, I'm not wumming here (and maybe being a bit thick), but why were the Nightingales built and then not used??
I take it, you have no insurance/assurance of any sort?

they were built as insurance for an overload.

the overload didn’t happen, as (very high) proportion of nation socially distanced, couldn’t go abroad, didn’t come from abroad, stopped going to hospital for a cut finger, didn’t go to hospital appts for almost anything, and it was a beautiful spring.

welcome to the current overload - with less nhs staff than before. Therefore the nightingales are even less likely to be used.
 
Ok, I'm not wumming here (and maybe being a bit thick), but why were the Nightingales built and then not used??

My understanding is that they had been set up as an overflow and the plan was to staff them with people they brought out of retirement, also they graduated the full year of student nurses early so they could be brought in to service them.

How i understand it. Now those extra staff they took back are again out of the service, so they have no staff that could properly run them. On the whole the issue of capacity is more to do with staffing levels as many have had to isolate etc..
 
Zero. They werent required (then) because ... we had a successful adhered to lockdown. With no travel abroad incoming/outgoing. The chance was missed and the general public got lax as the numbers dwindled to 100s
You sound like you think the reason why there is an issue is one those not following the rules.

if the virus is so easily spread, why does it rely on non-adherence to the rules to get out of control?

I don’t deny there isnt rule breaking (the scientists factor that into their modelling of lockdown) but it’s so lazy and tiresome to point to it as the problem. This is a virus which is impossible to stop spreading without restrictions on the ordinary way of life. We are living our lives incredibly differently to normal. There is absolutely no way that those not following the rules are anything more than the minority. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar. It’s just not happening to that extent. On the contrary and this has been cited by government, scientists etc... compliance has been beyond what was expected.

let’s look at the data and find other explanations
 
Work,? Mortgages.? What do their employers do keep their job open and try to manage without them? What about their children and childcare. What happens if they are a care provider?
Is there an example of a country that has done this?
So my point that it they are vulnerable they get support from the government, now I didn’t go into a great deal of detail but let’s say the vulnerable get furlough.

I’m offering a different view of how if can be managed, it might be right it might be wrong, some aspects could work some maybe not. But what is clear is how it is being managed now doesn’t work.
 
I had it explained to me a number of months ago about how bad a second wave could be, one of the things that really hit home was that she said the number of people becoming seriously ill is highly likely to increase but the mortality figure can be expected to reduce. This reduction was based on the number of people at risk that have now passed away in the first wave being replaced with stronger patients. The latest figures are showing the death rate to be over 70 thousand.

As such she expected hospitals to become even busier than the first wave because much needed beds in intensive care are not being released due to patients dying from Covid.

She was very matter of fact with this and the bluntness of her assessment hit me quite hard.
 
My mum & dad are 89 & 87. Live in Bredbury and all my dad as heard is early January.

Mine haven't heard a peep yet they don't go out anyway. My mum started going food shopping with my sister once a week but stopped when infections started rising again. Hopefully this twilight life ends for everyone soon.
 
I take it, you have no insurance/assurance of any sort?

they were built as insurance for an overload.

the overload didn’t happen, as (very high) proportion of nation socially distanced, couldn’t go abroad, didn’t come from abroad, stopped going to hospital for a cut finger, didn’t go to hospital appts for almost anything, and it was a beautiful spring.

welcome to the current overload - with less nhs staff than before. Therefore the nightingales are even less likely to be used.
Could they not be used as vaccination centres. Or even shelter for the homeless. Seems a waste
 
I take it, you have no insurance/assurance of any sort?

they were built as insurance for an overload.

the overload didn’t happen, as (very high) proportion of nation socially distanced, couldn’t go abroad, didn’t come from abroad, stopped going to hospital for a cut finger, didn’t go to hospital appts for almost anything, and it was a beautiful spring.

welcome to the current overload - with less nhs staff than before. Therefore the nightingales are even less likely to be used.
So they built them for a worse case scenario (which I understand completely) but knowing they have barely had enough staff for years to cover "normal" peaks? And when they were already calling for retired volunteers,?
It just doesn't make any sense as a long term plan. The building them does, but the actual logistics of manning them doesn't.
 
London hospital over Christmas is terrifying.

Patients 3966 / 4019 / 4276 / 4591 /4957 TODAY

1000 in - a 25% rise OVER Christmas.

The peak in wave one was 5201 on 9 April.

May well surpass that tomorrow.


Ventilators 462 / 455 / 489 / 520 / 556 TODAY

7 May last time it was that high and their peak was on 10 April at 1057.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top