Media Thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's amazing how many of their own followers don't know this.
Those transfer fees and wages were eye watering at the time, particularly as this was a SECOND DIVISION club at the time.
Just like they're not aware of their roots founded by a wealthy Sugar Daddy who gave them a stadium and bank rolled a whole team.
Both the Rags and Dippers have been given huge financial leg ups by benefactors on at least two occasions and neither would even exist today without their help.
There are so many similarities that I'm beginning to think they're the same club
Another similarity is that both clubs were formed by something they despise.

United formed by a scouser & Liverpool by a Tory.

Again most of their own fans I’ve met either don’t know this, or call me a liar when I tell them :)
 
Another similarity is that both clubs were formed by something they despise.

United formed by a scouser & Liverpool by a Tory.

Again most of their own fans I’ve met either don’t know this, or call me a liar when I tell them :)
A team in the north west, playing in red and managed by a Scotsman who proclaims socialist ideals while spending outlandish sums of money like a sailor on shore leave in Bangkok? Surely the Shankly model would never be repeated?....
 
Apparently Ashton’s father was a blue. His output suggests he has some serious Freudian daddy issues
I name Ashton a fair bit, and not always in a complimentary way, but tbf, all he’s guilty of is doing a decent job for his employer. Maybe we should have employed him instead (unless of course he specifically wanted to go to united).
 
Hahaha is Hooters still going? Remember coming up the side road from the station one Saturday lunchtime and the manager had all the girls in the orange hotpants and crop tops lined up waiting outside, as soon as the City fans came into view he ordered them up onto the benches outside and had them hula hooping and dancing.
As a guerilla marketing strategy it certainly worked, everyone piled in there
It was open up to lockdown and actually went in there last February and bumped into a Mansfield Town nawty boy I knew back in the day called Jonathon Partmenter, who was widely known in Nottingham as 'Parmental', so they still attracted the same really high class of clientele as recently as that!

That unit has always done very well (they have been known to sell half a metric tonne of chicken wings in an evening!) and it's been there since the turn of the last century, with the same manager (who is a good lad, even though he's a rag) throughout, so I've never quite understood why they haven't rolled it out elsewhere with any discernible level of success. I think there was one in Brum and Cardiff both of which failed. I know they looked at a site in Newcastle but got knocked back on the licence. A Manchester site is also ringing a bell too. Odd that it's worked so well, and for so long, in a relatively small place, but not elsewhere, especially given how successful it is in the States. Very strange. Never been able to work that one out.
 
History matters to City fans we have it in spades and regale in it, the present and the future is tomorrows history.
I wouldn't swap our history for all the tea in China. It's as interesting as any club's and I'm not so crippled by crushing insecurity that it has to be solely rooted in the acquisition of trophies.
 
That's how the club started in the first place, when John Houlding engineered the eviction of Everton from Anfield and bought a load of mainly Scottish players he called "Liverpool".

And United had not one but two sugar daddies, both of whom saved them from extinction.

Not sure if it's accurate (think Gary James has cast doubt) - but I heard years ago that the guy responsible for starting Newton Heath was a Scouser, over here working on the railways – whilst the Moores family were from Eccles way, and started out selling coupons outside Old Trafford...

So in a unique irony, Liverpool's success is ultimately down to Rags, and they in turn were started by a Scouser – no wonder they're equally detestable
 
I wouldn't swap our history for all the tea in China. It's as interesting as any club's and I'm not so crippled by crushing insecurity that it has to be solely rooted in the acquisition of trophies.

Most clubs have rich histories, some obviously more than others – but history is not dependent on how many shiny trinkets are in your cabinet!
 
Rashford now on Channel 5 News with the headline 'campaigner Marcus Rashford takes on the Government again (heavily stressed) over school meals'.
The actual report is somewhat different interviewing mums, mentioning that paediatricians and even Downing Street were unhappy with the packs being issued in lieu of the grocery voucher. Then there is a copy of a tweet purportedly written by him which gets the headlines and the professionals' and volunteers' ongoing work is sidelined. No mention of the obvious problems food banks have with the 'stay at home' message will have on them.
This lad might have good intentions but he is being played.
 
Why does history matter anyway? And I mean that however you define it.

Surely the present and the future are more important?

Sorry don‘t agree with that at all.

What makes Manchester City, Manchester City is its rich history.

Im sure all fans feel the same but I have always been immensely proud of our past and the uniqueness of our history stands us apart, in my eyes, to most other clubs.

From Agueroo (2012) to being relegated as Reigning champions and top scorers (1937), the Trautmann final (Broken neck), record attendance against Stoke (1934) to missing out on promotion after an 8-0 final day victory by a goal average of 0.0006 (1927) all these things are reasons I fell in love with the club. To me the history of the club is more important than the present and the current success is just icing on the cake.
 
"Merceneries". i'd forgotten that one. It is slightly off-topic because that was daft fans rather than the media, in the main, but kids all over the internet of the United persuasion were using it willy-nilly back in the day.

Just imagine how it felt on 28-4-12 when Kompany, Zabaleta, Aguero, Toure and all of those other mercenaries showed ten times as much heart and commitment as their "legends" to outplay, outrun and outfight their team in the most important derby of all time.

View attachment 8194
Anyone for the 'Your players make money, our players make history' banner?
 
History matters to City fans we have it in spades and regale in it, the present and the future is tomorrows history.
Sorry don‘t agree with that at all.

What makes Manchester City, Manchester City is its rich history.

Im sure all fans feel the same but I have always been immensely proud of our past and the uniqueness of our history stands us apart, in my eyes, to most other clubs.

From Agueroo (2012) to being relegated as Reigning champions and top scorers (1937), the Trautmann final (Broken neck), record attendance against Stoke (1934) to missing out on promotion after an 8-0 final day victory by a goal average of 0.0006 (1927) all these things are reasons I fell in love with the club. To me the history of the club is more important than the present and the current success is just icing on the cake.
I was lacking context. I meant why does history matter when assessing a team as far as what it deserves, in the capacity that the media often reference it as others were discussing in the thread. Not why history matters at all in a general sense, which on reflection is how it reads.
 
Rashford now on Channel 5 News with the headline 'campaigner Marcus Rashford takes on the Government again (heavily stressed) over school meals'.
The actual report is somewhat different interviewing mums, mentioning that paediatricians and even Downing Street were unhappy with the packs being issued in lieu of the grocery voucher. Then there is a copy of a tweet purportedly written by him which gets the headlines and the professionals' and volunteers' ongoing work is sidelined. No mention of the obvious problems food banks have with the 'stay at home' message will have on them.
This lad might have good intentions but he is being played.
Just heard on talk radio "another own goal by the government who have scored more own goals than Richard Dunne in his prime"
 
Rashford (as sickly as the coverage is) doesn't deserve the hate in this thread. He got out there and helped out and he's doing a good thing for poor people who don't have enough food. I quite like that it took a lad from Wythenshawe to highlight the issues.
Quite right mate.

It saddens me that some brain dead morons actually seem to hate United more than they care about hungry children.

Marcus Rashford is one of the finest examples of what a modern footballler should be, more than virtually any other out there.

THe lad is a modern day hero. He really should be knighted asap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top