KennyG
Well-Known Member
£50m + Sterling for Kane.
Lol£50m + Sterling for Kane.
You couldnt be more wrong,so dont worry.i hope im wrong but it would be typical city to not get Haaland, Fail with bids for Lukaku and Kane and end up paying 50 to 60 million euros for Isak. And then City fans go into meltdown
Interesting to read that Barca want Haaland as well as retaining Messi. Their finance team is doing a wonderful job during these challenging economic times...
The news I read (from a not very reliable source) is their plan was to get rid of about six players to get Haaland. So they are going to make their already depleted team even weaker for one player? And that’s supposed to be appealing for him?Interesting to read that Barca want Haaland as well as retaining Messi. Their finance team is doing a wonderful job during these challenging economic times...
Isak would be an excellent fallback option, he's going to be a top striker.i hope im wrong but it would be typical city to not get Haaland, Fail with bids for Lukaku and Kane and end up paying 50 to 60 million euros for Isak. And then City fans go into meltdown
This made me chuckle!If he comes, 1-2 could get messy for the commentators.
It’s Erling to Sterling to Erling
Sounds about righti hope im wrong but it would be typical city to not get Haaland, Fail with bids for Lukaku and Kane and end up paying 50 to 60 million euros for Isak. And then City fans go into meltdown
The lineups will look sillyIf he comes, 1-2 could get messy for the commentators.
It’s Erling to Sterling to Erling
Curious where you are getting your stats. I don't see any similarities.similar goals to minutes ratio as well
This will never happen, it would be Its Erling to Sterling who falls over.If he comes, 1-2 could get messy for the commentators.
It’s Erling to Sterling to Erling
If he comes, 1-2 could get messy for the commentators.
It’s Erling to Sterling to Erling