City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

This will be reported as FFP being ditched because City abused it.

What they replace it with will indeed be interesting, I also wonder if they are actually just going to embrace foreign investment. Barca with Saudi money would be even bigger!

Thank god City are ahead of the game!!
 
What a fucking surprise, just as Barca, Madrid ans both sets of red shite need to rebuild their squads.

Its not only uefa FFP holding them back is it?
For Barca and Madrid its lack of cash reserves and la liga rules on wage limits. For liverpool its their owners being unusually tight. And for united its full industrial incompetence from top to bottom.
 
So-called "Financial Fair Play" from the start - IMO - was simply a tool designed to ensure that the extant top clubs in European football remained at the top.

Under FFP, large clubs with extant sources of revenue would be able to recruit top prospects by spending big.

Whereas smaller sides - hoping to break into the top - even in cases were such small sides were bought by extremely wealthy individuals/collectives - would be limited in their expenditures - making it impossible to compete for the talent necessary to transform a small club into a club able to compete for major trophies.
===
Instead of FFP - I'd like to see regulations ensuring that clubs remain financially sound. If a small club owned by a very rich owner wishes to lavishly spend the owner's money - that should be allowed.

Under FFP a club cannot spend more than they earn, thus, locking in extant big clubs to the detriment of clubs hoping to become big.
 
I expect it will be some of Agnelli's silly rules, such as not being allowed to buy players from clubs in the same European competition, and something like transfer spend based on % of commercial revenue only and excluding tv revenue, so the English clubs are castrated and the status quo can siphen off the TV money to pay off debt and pay dividends as they won't be able to spend it, the non top 6 English clubs wouldn't be able to use the TV money to jump up the ladder and their commercial revenues would be too small to challenge.
 
I don't know if this is good for us tbh

In theory it sounds great but I don't reckon we'll spend anymore than we do, if anything more likely that PSG/Madrid/Barca etc will drop bigger fee's
 
I expect it will be some of Agnelli's silly rules, such as not being allowed to buy players from clubs in the same European competition, and something like transfer spend based on % of commercial revenue only and excluding tv revenue, so the English clubs are castrated and the status quo can siphen off the TV money to pay off debt and pay dividends as they won't be able to spend it, the non top 6 English clubs wouldn't be able to use the TV money to jump up the ladder and their commercial revenues would be too small to challenge.
For once Liverpool City United Chelsea might be on the same side.

The continental cartel have realised they can’t specifically target City so they have to go for the PL now.

This is the sort of thing Khaldoon was talking about in one of his end of year speeches. He said something like you might not be interested in defending City but defend the PL as a whole...it’s your job.

Ive seen this idea of not being able to buy players from clubs that are also in the CL and I don’t get the idea at all it’s bizarre and sounds like restraint of trade and freedom of movement.
 
Just from a City perspective this is terrible news for us now. We potentially lose our competitive advantage. IF they created fair regulation that helped equalise finances in the game I'd be in favour of any changes. BUT this won't happen. It will be some ham-fisted change that will help the G14 and stops new entrants from competing.
 
-This is great for City. If they remove FFP we can spend anything we like.

on top of this, financial problems of Real, Barca, Juve wont be solved by simple regulation change. They are also poorly managed clubs. Its all about personnel at the club, not any regulations.
 
From freezing to cancellation. The Financial Fair Play (FFP) as we know it may have run its course after just over 10 years. As reported by Gazzetta dello Sport, UEFA will discuss a new system of rules for continental football tomorrow in a videoconference at the European Parliament, which will be very different from the one devised in 2010 by the Platini-Infantino duo.

The basic idea, according to the newspaper, will be the transition from the idea of "spending as much as you take in" to "spending as much as you need without wasting". In light of the need to change the system there are obviously the economic effects of the pandemic, with disastrous figures far more than 2008, and virtually no clubs in line with the parameters.

The new model will therefore focus on waste and exaggeration, because football is in crisis but players' salaries and commissions to agents are not decreasing.

One idea could be the introduction of a salary cap, disguised as a luxury tax to ensure compliance with European regulations: you buy a player, you pay a percentage to be distributed to the system. In addition, sporting sanctions could be reduced in favour of greater economic sanctions.

In any case, it is unlikely that UEFA would want to impose itself on clubs without dialogue. The crisis requires shared action, but it must be done quickly. Not everyone will be happy, but something has to be done to protect the system. Foreign leagues, such as the German and Spanish leagues, which have been implementing stricter rules for some time, are well aware of this.

In Italy, on the other hand, it will be necessary to intervene as hoped by president Gravina, who was the first to launch the idea of a salary cap. The UEFA work has already begun with the aim of achieving approval by the end of the year, with entry into force from 2022, and a period of gradual adaptation, a few years, before going full steam ahead and consolidating better than the previous system.
 
-This is great for City. If they remove FFP we can spend anything we like.

on top of this, financial problems of Real, Barca, Juve wont be solved by simple regulation change. They are also poorly managed clubs. Its all about personnel at the club, not any regulations.
We won’t though we will stick to our budget as always
 
-This is great for City. If they remove FFP we can spend anything we like.

on top of this, financial problems of Real, Barca, Juve wont be solved by simple regulation change. They are also poorly managed clubs. Its all about personnel at the club, not any regulations.
Nah, be sure PSG and City spending will be considered as "wasting" and will need to pay some luxury tax.
 
Hmmm will this be implemented with immediate effect as in this upcoming transfer window teams will be allowed to spend far more again.Wonder if this will effect our supposed interest in halland as in more clubs now piling in ...
I think you’ve nailed it
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top