Stiff Little Wingers
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 3,008
There must be potential for litigation by City
Haha, exactly... should have added the caveat "IF"Totally agree but this is City.
Kane takes penalties. He'd be a shoe-in for the Golden Boot if he played for the rags.Harry kane says he would love to play alongside Kev De Bruyne.............but the super computer says pogbad, rashford, penandes are the perfect team-mates
Oh well that nails it then
Bwaaahaahahahahahaahahahahahah
It's just small dick syndrome.I don't understand why it's always the biggest that is the best. We might not be the biggest club, the richest club, the club with most internet fans ,but I'll tell you what, we are the best club.
lies being told only become dangerous when the viewers, readers or listeners WANT to believe them. and at the moment they do.Conn at it in The Guardian and he's got a full house and then some in the City Bingo card.
My biggest issue is that he says our owners have pumped £2.5B into the club which is not true. They have spent that amount on The City Football Group by acquiring other teams and building the infrastructure of said teams.
City have obviously been the main benefactor of the money but no one truly knows how much they have spent solely on us.
But tell a lie long enough and people will accept it as truth
Yeah think we've turned a corner now, to a degree mainstream media especially the stuff that kids see is probably not anti-City which is all we ever wanted.It used to royally piss me off when reading the negative articles about both our club, owners and the attacks on our fan base.....but it has become so clear what the agenda is that I dont even register it any longer to allow myself to get wound up
It is rinse and repeat the same old cliche stories, that I just now laugh them all off. I find it more entertaining that they put out the same old revised articles that it just shows their desperation and jealousy
In fact I would say I revel in it now. for those fellow Blues who still get angered etc, dont. Look past the reaction that they want and just see it for what it is and just laugh at them
He'd have to relinquish those duties at the rags, can't let Penandez's stats drop, by letting Kane take them!Kane takes penalties. He'd be a shoe-in for the Golden Boot if he played for the rags.
The usual fabrication. Will Conn write an article about Amnesty International's "human rights muddying"?![]()
Manchester City’s rise from stumbles of old to fine-tuned global product
Manchester City have become an exercise in how to construct the supreme modern football club with the Abu Dhabi-owned team close to achieving their target of European supremacywww.theguardian.com
What a fucking bore.
The racist overtones are plain to see in another re-tread article of repetitive shit!David conn isnt a fan of arabs is he
And here we were erroneously thinking that yer paid lawyers a hefty wedge to assemble a few ideas re evidence and due process. Does the cockwomble ever point out that the motley gathering of 'super 'istree clubs' had been in so much of a fuckin' rush to shove us back down the ladder that they forget that 'due process' is all part of the evidence that lawyers will explain in court and to arbitration bodies. Uefa and the usual hyenas royally fucked up and the pillock, like a good few in the RDAHMeedya, can't swallow the outcome.I wonder why only City’s ownership is regularly forensically analysed by such paragons of objectivity such as Conn. Presumably every other football club in existence has been founded, funded and administered with impeccable ethics. I thank him for telling me it was City’s lawyers who had the uefa ban overturned and that facts and evidence had nothing to do with it.
Obviously his opinion has nothing to do with the fact that currently the history clubs tm. are years behind City
League clubs that have gone to the wall (in that incarnation) since 1983 - the end of splitting gate reciepts with away team (ta United), and formation of money disparity PL (ta, United et al):The racist overtones are plain to see in another re-tread article of repetitive shit!
I see his plumbed new depths in blaming City for the demise of Bolton, Wigan and Bury.
What a horrible, boring fucker he is.
thats my take. The transfer kiddies get so excited thoughI'm 100% in agreement. I'm not actually that keen on him coming to city tbh, when harlaand is available. Why pay 100m+ for someone who's best days are behind them when you can pay 150m for someone who has 10yrs in him..
I'm pretty laid back on this transfer but saying his best days are behind him have no basis in reality whatsoever.thats my take. The transfer kiddies get so excited though
Saying he has a glass ankle isnt real either. He's an attractive prospect and I am sure the club want him.I'm pretty laid back on this transfer but saying his best days are behind him have no basis in reality whatsoever.
I've no issue with those arguments, just the poster you replied to said his best days are behind him when he's coming off his best season to date.Saying he has a glass ankle isnt real either. He's an attractive prospect and I am sure the club want him.
Dealing with Levy and his demands though might make it impossible, better spending that money on Haaland or Mbappe imo, especially when you think what that £120m investment will look like in 3 years time with either Kane/Haaland/Mbappe
Probably already been posted, seeing as it's a week old at this stage. But I only came across (Oo-err) it this morning......
What a bitter begrudger he is.
Levy will pull the old trick (we need to buy a replacement striker first) to spin this saga out all summer long.Dealing with Levy and his demands though might make it impossible