I touched on this in another post (first paragraph) and it's no surprise to read what you've posted.Everything in the garden is lovely, according to Henry Winter and most other journos. Southgate is the man to lead us for the foreseeable (he is apparently more popular than Churchill now, says a poll), and England can only get better. The team achieved a near-miracle by losing narrowly in a major European tournament. It was all so wonderful and thrilling.
Compare all this (bits of it may be partly true) with City reaching a major European club competition final in Porto. All we heard was "Pep fails again to win the big one", etc, etc. No one said "City can only get better" or "Have a great chance next time".
The difference is that English journos see the national team through rose-tinted specs, and City with a jaundiced eye, looking for negatives.
Can we have equal treatment please?
Probably not.
England fans are conditioned to failure so as soon as they see a team reaching a semi or a final its good enough for them and they will stick with Southgate for as long as Southgate wants to stay. Style of play matters not one jot to them
They fail to see that we could achieve much more with a less cautious manager who can get the best out of the riches of talent at their disposal.