Typical Jenas, waffling utter nonsense for 90% and a bit of common sense within the last paragraph.Expect some proper smacked arse redshirt-friendly bollocks in the papers tomorrow.
Here’s Jermaine Jenas’s genius hot take for starters
View attachment 22335View attachment 22336View attachment 22337
We’re dropping the cash off upfront!
I really like the flexibility we'll have in the side if he joins. Him and Phil on the left will rotate and constantly interchange. In Peps system where the idea is to move opposition around it'll be invaluable to have two players so comfortable coming inside and Grealish has that Hazard like ability to drift past players.
£100m is obviously steep. But having Raheem, Foden, Walker, Stones, Grealish and Kane all potentially in your XI it's fantastic.
Thank fuck Pornhub is free.....I agree Doris, the money in football is mental and probably right it goes to the players but I dont understand why your average fan has to fork out a fortune to watch.
I probably spend more of my disposable income watching City than anything else. It has got expensive.
Great point which is 100% fucking true.flexing our financial muscles at last - then same for Kane............face it .........if we bought a player from Hereford for £250k we would be ruining football so just do it and fuck'em all
Yeah good point. I think some release clauses do stipulate it has to be paid in one drop?That smells like a release clause to me.
That's my thinking. It's definitely possible these are just agreed terms, but considering that we've heard a lot of talk about a release clause which usually (but not always) has a stipulation of being paid up front in one, and now we're hearing this news, it smells like a release clause.Yeah good point. I think some release clauses do stipulate it has to be paid in one drop?
I think if this bid is accepted it also reveals it’s a release clause. In these kind of sagas, with no clause, there’s usually a rejected bid or two so that they can show their fans they are fighting to keep him. If this just goes through fairly straightforward, that is another sign of a release clause I’d say.That's my thinking. It's definitely possible these are just agreed terms, but considering that we've heard a lot of talk about a release clause which usually (but not always) has a stipulation of being paid up front in one, and now we're hearing this news, it smells like a release clause.
Eh?It doesnt necessarily mean release clause. It just means we are guaranteeing Villa £100m without any add ons that have to be triggered by success etc.
If there really was clause this would bave been done ages ago.
Well why? If it was done ages ago we'd have had to pay hundreds of thousands in wages to Grealish before he even stepped foot in Manchester.It doesnt necessarily mean release clause. It just means we are guaranteeing Villa £100m without any add ons that have to be triggered by success etc.
If there really was clause this would bave been done ages ago.
That smells like a release clause to me.
No, it doesnt mean release clause at all. It means a fee agreed and we‘ve got the dough so to move the deal along we are paying up front.Eh?
£100m upfront, no add ons
That's a release clause
I don't think so, but I don't really know so maybe.A release clause that would expire on July 31st?