The denial is heavy.Sky won't even talk about Kane missing
The denial is heavy.Sky won't even talk about Kane missing
While I agree. It's a pointless Blount. I similarly don't understand why anyone gets bothered by it. Good teams cost money. Is like saying water is wet. its a dumb point to state, but it's equally strange to be bothered that's it's stated.Took Sky 5 mins to mention how much the team and bench cost... wankers
Yeah, just a 'nothing' story.Sky won't even talk about Kane missing
At their peak performances Dinho for sure but factoring age I would go for Rodri. Problem is Rodri has not had any decent runs of consistency but he’s more than capable.If both are on their A game, who would you have?
Good I hope we spend another billion and dominate for the foreseeable fuck emBet no mention of the Rags yesterday
Didn’t we retire the number when Delph left?Kane will be 18
Well done mate you won't miss it.Feel so good knowing I've cancelled my Sky Sports subscription this week. Sick to death of hearing them spout the same shit season after season.
They put together a montage of City to start the show and just bigged up how much the talent on our bench is worth.Zero Class from Sky Sports
yepI am the only one who wish’s Jack would get a short cut and get rid of that hair band.
Ha ha. Had to re-read. Looked like 'two nobs'.Expecting a performance broadly similar to that we gave in the Community Shield.
I am guessing we are going with two No6s. I would think Ferna or Gundogan will spend much of their time babysitting Mendy.
While I agree. It's a pointless Blount. I similarly don't understand why anyone gets bothered by it. Good teams cost money. Is like saying water is wet. its a dumb point to state, but it's equally strange to be bothered that's it's stated.
Or at least that's how I see it.