Harry Kane

fodenilson said:
Speaking of which, remember when he was thrown on against Leicester last season in the second game of the season? What happened there?
Click to expand...
The defence evaporated that day and Delap got few if any opportunities to try to turn the tide. It will be interesting to see how he has matured. Needs to get a chance again off the bench if we need a goal if not should be out on loan.
 
fodenilson said:
Speaking of which, remember when he was thrown on against Leicester last season in the second game of the season? What happened there?
Click to expand...
Are you trying to blame that game on him or something? I remember him coming close to scoring with the one chance he got when he hit the crossbar from a header. Anyway this is the Kane thread I believe
 
Eoiyflem said:
Bollocks. Beckham was the number 10 by default when he was a very young player and it had no relevance whatsoever at the time it just happened to be unallocated, got the 7 when sardine features left & before he became a megastar (remember France 98??) And became 23 and kept it throughout the rest of his career when he was a mega star in 2003 at, you've guessed it, 28 years old. Messi is now number 30, the greatest player of all time. This marketability bullshit exists only on this thread, it's a complete and total non-argument! Kane doesn't even have his number attached to any of his social media platforms, there is no Kane 10 brand!! its rubbish!
Click to expand...
You obviously not in marketing buddy. #10 is the king of the hill.
 
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Nowhere in the post did I mention our number 23 shirt. Keith was saying Beckham was a popular number like 7 or 10 to which I said and 23. No idea where our 23 being retired for Foe came from
Click to expand...
23 is a huge number in the States. Beckham knew this and maximised its marketing.

If you mention the number 23 in relation to City in any context, people will tell you that it isn’t on the table as it has been retired.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
City retired the number 23 shirt in memoriam of Marc Vivien Foe
Click to expand...

I appreciate this is off topic from the Kane speculation, but I posted about this in the media thread yesterday. In the Norwich match day programme squad list, it no longer lists the number 23 shirt or references that it was retired in memoriam of Marc Vivien Foe.

I was surprised by this as it has always been included in squad lists in programmes ever since he sadly passed away. I have no idea why it was removed and am curious as to why, if anyone happens to know?
 
blueparrot said:
If reports are true. They probably aren’t though. If we didn’t think it was worth carrying on talking we wouldn’t carry on talking. The fact we are means we think we can get it done, if we can’t we can’t. I think we probably will. At what price I really couldn’t care less.
Click to expand...
You're assuming they' are still talking. Reports are that Levy isn't answering the phone anymore. I don't know about the divide in the financial packages anymore than you know whether City and Levy are still talking. I would imagine all Levy has to do is say, "the deal starts at 150 million. I won't even answer your phone call if its less than that". Its up to City to match what Levy wants. That's really all there is to it.
 
Sam lee hinted that this guy is legit, got Grealish right and has been reliable this window.

 
please stop saying someone has been "reliable" because they said city will sign grealish and we ended up signing grealish
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top