Football transfer spending falls with cut-price deals for Messi and Ronaldo
Top players still in demand at elite European clubs but loan deals proliferate as the sport’s minnows struggle
www.ft.com
That's not really correct, we have beaten those teams to players before. In the case when we have convinced the player to choose us and boxed it off then we've beaten off teams. This will be similar if we can get Haaland to choose us we'll pay the release and get him. If he allows it to become a bidding war based on money only then we won't. I actually don't think we would bother about the 40 mill agent money either if it was a fixed thing, again we wouldn't enter into a bidding war on fees .PSG can afford to do it and they’re a power club and no doubt part of it with mbappe was about sending a message to their top stars and to other European clubs that they do not sell or negotiate for their top players.
Dortmund are and always have been a selling club, but they’re also reliant on being in the champions league. They kept Sancho for another year, knowing he’d help them last season and that they’d still get a big fee this summer. My point is, I very much doubt they would have been so adamant Haaland wasn’t for sale all summer if they can lose him in January.
We will find out either way in January. But it’s all moot anyway because City won’t get this deal done when the competition will be Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, PSG & no doubt several others. Not that we aren’t attractive to players but as a club we have been consistently unable to get deals for ready made superstars over the line. Our top players over the last decade or so have become truly world class at City.
KDB established himself as one of the best players in the Bundesliga and was integral in the club's 2014–15 DFB-Pokal win. Thats exactly what Haaland has done.
PSG can afford to do it and they’re a power club and no doubt part of it with mbappe was about sending a message to their top stars and to other European clubs that they do not sell or negotiate for their top players.
Dortmund are and always have been a selling club, but they’re also reliant on being in the champions league. They kept Sancho for another year, knowing he’d help them last season and that they’d still get a big fee this summer. My point is, I very much doubt they would have been so adamant Haaland wasn’t for sale all summer if they can lose him in January.
We will find out either way in January. But it’s all moot anyway because City won’t get this deal done when the competition will be Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, PSG & no doubt several others. Not that we aren’t attractive to players but as a club we have been consistently unable to get deals for ready made superstars over the line. Our top players over the last decade or so have become truly world class at City.
Isn't the fact that they kept sancho for another year and accepted a lower info indicative of their willingness to receive less money if it means they get to keep a player they desperately wanna keep?PSG can afford to do it and they’re a power club and no doubt part of it with mbappe was about sending a message to their top stars and to other European clubs that they do not sell or negotiate for their top players.
Dortmund are and always have been a selling club, but they’re also reliant on being in the champions league. They kept Sancho for another year, knowing he’d help them last season and that they’d still get a big fee this summer. My point is, I very much doubt they would have been so adamant Haaland wasn’t for sale all summer if they can lose him in January.
We will find out either way in January. But it’s all moot anyway because City won’t get this deal done when the competition will be Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, PSG & no doubt several others. Not that we aren’t attractive to players but as a club we have been consistently unable to get deals for ready made superstars over the line. Our top players over the last decade or so have become truly world class at City.
I swear...we can't do this. Txiki, Ferran, Omar do it ? no...i don't think so