Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
bluthrunthru said:
We won't have to bankrupt ourselves.

Most sources put Haaland's Dortmund salary at 150k per week. It's safe to assume he's going to want that doubling at the very least when he moves clubs; he'll feel he's earned that and the reality is, he has. That would be 300k per week; Aubameyang currently takes home 350k weekly. Point being he's better than most of the premier league's top earners; if we were to put him on parity with Kev or even close to that outlay, it'd be worth it. I don't believe the reports of him wanting close to a million a week; blatantly, that's beyond the realms of possibility for any club. If I had to guess, I reckon he'll be on 350-400k at his next club. Our club should have the means of signing him: we were willing to part with circa 100m for Kane; in all likelihood we'll sell a couple of big names next summer to supplement that, as well as the extra revenues, potential prize money from the current season.

There is a caveat for his potential suitors. He has one more season at Dortmund to prove the numbers he's delivered over the last two years aren't a fluke. And be honest, do you think the goals are going to dry up? The likelihood is they won't, and come next summer he'll be firmly established as the best CF in the world. And the best CF is going to want the highest salary; that's basic supply and demand.

I feel City are at an interesting phase in their development post-takeover. On the field and off, I feel our growth has plateaued. On the field, we're consistently winning leagues and cups but still covet Big Ears. Off the field, we're now established as a big club but to become a veritable superpower we're this type of signing away from breaking that plateau; the commercial value of a signing like this is as powerful as the unfathomable productivity we'd be treated to week in, week out.

If he elects to go elsewhere, then that's out of our control. But let's go for the jugular and at least offer what the rest do.

Time to be aggressive!
Click to expand...
I’m all for having a good go but offering what the best of the rest do? What if that figure is stupid money? At the end of the day we know what we can afford and it’s not relevant what other clubs think they can afford. We are run as a business and if other clubs want to exceed what we can afford that’s their funeral (unless they genuinely can afford the deal)

Football clubs have lost a fortune recently, now isn’t the time to go big and end up like Barca just to have Haaland. I would be happy, once our limit was exceeded, to push the price up and then watch United do a “Ronaldo”

The next time Stephan appears on a 93.20 podcast it’s worth a listen to understand City’s finances. They can’t and won’t do a stupid deal just for PR purposes not that we would get much good PR anyway! Shiny toys are not our thing the player has to fit in on and off the field if possible and we are still learning from our fewer and fewer mistakes.

As a bear minimum I can’t see City being happy with a buyout clause written into his City contract.

There is a big sign at the City training complex that says “not a team of Superstars”

Time to be effective and realistic. Haaland is a means to an end and he has a worth to us that is also unique to us.

Remember it’s not just Aguero that will still need replacing in a year but Mendy and Fernandinho too…that’s a lot of dosh!
 
Last edited:
I'd love to see Haaland at City if for nothing else than his success being a beautiful payback to the super untalented Media man Mr. Roy Keane.
On the other hand, I can't help hoping that this becomes the case that broke the 'super agents'.
Haaland ending up with no bids realistic enough to pay Raiola's leach money and another year at Dortmund would be a massive step in the right direction.
 
I respect players who see football as a way to make as much money as they can, football careers are short and retirements are long, and Erling knows this more than most, but I also respect players more who balance that drive to earn with a drive to win. I don't think a signing should come in and earn more than Kev does. He's won us games and trophies, earns a lot for it, but not as much as he might elsewhere, but recognizes our club makes him a better player with the best facilities in the world. As things stand, United don't offer that, and if they want to pay silly money then let them. That's where I stand anyway. Can understand the desire from the other side to spend whatever it takes.
 
If it’s a bidding war against them lot we may have a problem. They don’t seem to have any issues with paying ridiculous salaries or agent’s fees. They have a much better relationship with Raiola, though that may change depending on Pogba’s future.

We’ve seen them buy players they barely need like Sanchez, Fred & Ronaldo almost solely to get one up on us, however Haaland would improve any side he joins.

If we are at the table for Haaland, it makes sense for his people to keep United’s name in the equation. We don’t know whether they will be interested because of the huge wages they’ve given Ronaldo.

So if we do go for him, expect united hijack headlines at every point. We really won’t know how true they are until Haaland signs for either side.
 
Need to convince him this is the best place for him to win and improve, so he makes the choice. Raiola only has to get he best deal from one club at that point.

He's gonna be rich as fuck when he retires regardless, how much does he wanna be the best around?

Optimistic no, dreaming still..
 
Bluesiam said:
I'd love to see Haaland at City if for nothing else than his success being a beautiful payback to the super untalented Media man Mr. Roy Keane.
On the other hand, I can't help hoping that this becomes the case that broke the 'super agents'.
Haaland ending up with no bids realistic enough to pay Raiola's leach money and another year at Dortmund would be a massive step in the right direction.
Click to expand...
Pre COVID there would have been some idiot willing to pay from an egotistical point of view. Now I’m not so sure.

If we went for this at the rumoured costs we could wave goodbye to a LB and a DM unless they are both coming from the Academy.

He‘s only a kid but I’d be embarrassed if my agent was asking for all this. I suppose he will think he is better leaving it to Raiola.
 
Centurions said:
True except that nobody will agree to a 4 year deal with the way this is panning out. He's surely only going to be signed on a very long term contract with no release clause (excepting the Spanish €2billion nonsense).
Click to expand...
So, City will turn him down for his release clause money if he refuses a deal longer than 4 years?

Yer havin a laff!
 
daflanger said:
The whole issue is what the agent wants and what the salary will be. It will not bode well with our structure so I don't think this would happen. Honestly I would go for Bellingham more than I would for Haaland if we are ever going to buy a player from Dortmund.

Haaland will cost alot of money and will de-stablize the wage structure and I don't think KDB and others would be happen a new comer will get more salary than them
Click to expand...
If this was the case, everyone would be jealous of everyone else all the time. It just doesn’t work that way.

Dias wins everything last season at $80K, just signed a new deal for $160K (so media says).

Why not $250K???

If he sorted out our defence and won awards for doing it, why would he settle for $160K with other making far more???
 
Either get on board with the club philosophy or do one elsewhere. No matter how good he is, 1 player doesn't make a team and we have an outstanding squad, upcoming talent and could find a replacement that fits within our wage structure. One whiff of them taking the piss and we should walk and stop fannying about like we did this summer.
 
ChicagoBlue said:
So, City will turn him down for his release clause money if he refuses a deal longer than 4 years?

Yer havin a laff!
Click to expand...

I would refuse it yes, if there is any truth that a club interested in signing him are going to be paying around £25 million each to Raiola and Alfie plus a signing on fee for the player himself then it would be madness.

Basically £65 million fee plus around the same again in agent fee's and signing of fees mean we would be committing to an outlay in excess of £130 million before wages knowing that after 4 years the player could walk away on a free transfer.
 
baggy said:
Either get on board with the club philosophy or do one elsewhere. No matter how good he is, 1 player doesn't make a team and we have an outstanding squad, upcoming talent and could find a replacement that fits within our wage structure. One whiff of them taking the piss and we should walk and stop fannying about like we did this summer.
Click to expand...
Think Haaland will have a deal sorted and ready to go well before the window opens next year. So either way I don’t think it will go into the summer dragging on. Plus no tournaments next summer.
What I’d really like is us to get to the summer thinking you know what Torres and Delap are looking pretty good and not be that bothered about Haaland.
 
ChicagoBlue said:
So, City will turn him down for his release clause money if he refuses a deal longer than 4 years?

Yer havin a laff!
Click to expand...
And see him run it down and go to Real maybe for free, damn right I'm saying that. His release clause might be lower than what he'd cost right now but the agents fees will still be just as high, not to mention destroying any wage structure along the way before he swans off into the distance.
 

There is a possibility for Haaland to play with Mbappe, great football players are always with each other
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top