Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can live with that if he plays at a world class level for five years.
I don't think City would, you never know with any player but I think City are quite right to have concerns over the motivation of Haaland and his dad and agent. He could down tools after 2/3 seasons and want out, that won't sit right with Khaldoon etc.
 
he was tapped up matey simple

they knew city had no other choice because a unhappy player is worthless to the manager
the agent knows every bit of the deal he was on at manchester city and is it water tight with a buyout clause

the buyout clause is protection to the club and greedy agents wanting more money
they get players to play the home sick card or they don't like the manchester weather ?
Every signing involves tapping up.
 
I don't think City would, you never know with any player but I think City are quite right to have concerns over the motivation of Haaland and his dad and agent. He could down tools after 2/3 seasons and want out, that won't sit right with Khaldoon etc.
He wouldn't be playing at a world class level if he downed tools though would he?
 
He wouldn't be playing at a world class level if he downed tools though would he?
So he has two fantastic seasons winning us a couple of prems and a CL trophy. Then Perez is on the phone to Raiola and Haaland thinks ive completed the premier league, i fancy it.

City aren't ones for getting involved in drawn out sagas and nonsense.
 
I don't think City would, you never know with any player but I think City are quite right to have concerns over the motivation of Haaland and his dad and agent. He could down tools after 2/3 seasons and want out, that won't sit right with Khaldoon etc.
That is possible. I was theorizing on the idea he would play five years and leave on a free transfer. If he were to do that, he would likely try to keep his stock high by playing well.
 
Doesn’t sound like he’s chosen anyone. As for the reference to ‘Team’ Haaland - it sums up modern day transfers. Bit tiring this now.


Unless there's a release clause activation (I haven't been paying attention to that possibility for my own sanity because the January window is mad.) I would advise only checking in once in a while until the summer. That's when it all heats up.
 
So he has two fantastic seasons winning us a couple of prems and a CL trophy. Then Perez is on the phone to Raiola and Haaland thinks ive completed the premier league, i fancy it.

City aren't ones for getting involved in drawn out sagas and nonsense.
You said you didn't think City would be happy with him playing at a world class level for 5 seasons. I simply pointed out if he does what you suggest, he wouldn't be playing at a world class level for 5 seasons. he'd only be doing it for 2-3
 
You said you didn't think City would be happy with him playing at a world class level for 5 seasons. I simply pointed out if he does what you suggest, he wouldn't be playing at a world class level for 5 seasons. he'd only be doing it for 2-3
And frankly if he's here two years and in those two years we win both league titles and a Champions League title? Sure, I'm okay with that. If he wants to go conquer Spain, we set a price and tell Real Madrid (and Barca, I suppose) and wish him well.
 
I'm constantly surprised by how many people still don't know this, but this is how pretty much every transfer works and has been for a long time. Contact with the player/agent is almost always made before contact with the club, to gauge interest, and players almost always agree on personal terms long before the two clubs have agreed a fee. City do the exact same thing as do all professional clubs. If that's 'tapping up', everyone is guilty.

your right
but making so simple to name there price buying club instead of what we want selling club
i wish there was a way to keep players with buyout clauses in england and the premier league

have manchester city ever had to sell a player and got a transfer that makes sense or over his market value and value to the club ? ok torres was a profit but if he takes off at barcelona then that fee will be small
 
Barca: "We'd like to buy your player"
City: "He's got a billion pound buy out"
Barca: "We can't afford that but we could afford £50m?"
City: "Well, we don't want unhappy players here so, ok"

but the buyout clause would scare them off that's why barcelona have it
think if its was the other way round and torres not happy at barcelona and city offered £50million you think we get the player ??

like i said agents know what in there players contract and can work around a contract without a clause
but have players on water tight deals then its impossible. just like messi was a free agent because he had a word of mouth deal to leave for free ? but barcelona laugh at him and city and wanted £500milion
 
You said you didn't think City would be happy with him playing at a world class level for 5 seasons. I simply pointed out if he does what you suggest, he wouldn't be playing at a world class level for 5 seasons. he'd only be doing it for 2-3
I meant, City wouldn't be happy with him playing 5 seasons then just fucking off on a free.
 
but the buyout clause would scare them off that's why barcelona have it
think if its was the other way round and torres not happy at barcelona and city offered £50million you think we get the player ??

like i said agents know what in there players contract and can work around a contract without a clause
but have players on water tight deals then its impossible. just like messi was a free agent because he had a word of mouth deal to leave for free ? but barcelona laugh at him and city and wanted £500milion
If they player is tapped up and wants to leave. They have to bench an asset and pay him for nothing or deal the best move they can get before he walks for free. RC Value makes no difference anymore just a legal requirement. Its might as well be a prince or infinity symbol, hence they have gone with a billion.

The approach and deal will still be the same for a club or agent. Sound him out, tap him up, await the club bending for what they can get or they get zero.
 
but the buyout clause would scare them off that's why barcelona have it
think if its was the other way round and torres not happy at barcelona and city offered £50million you think we get the player ??

like i said agents know what in there players contract and can work around a contract without a clause
but have players on water tight deals then its impossible. just like messi was a free agent because he had a word of mouth deal to leave for free ? but barcelona laugh at him and city and wanted £500milion
Barca have a buy out because it's a legal requirement in Spain. They got burned by PSG/Neymar so now have ridiculously large buyout's that effectively make them redundant. If we wanted one of their players we'd either agree a price, or we wouldn't and they'd be stuck with an unhappy player. Would you be happy for a player to be stinking the place out at City?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top