Metal Biker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 22,629
- Team supported
- Manchester City (and McLaren F1)
Because why not...
I think it creates context helping citizens understand why European & other Western democracies need to be engaged, beyond the geopolitical reasons, even though Ukraine is not a NATO member.The latest US intelligence re kidnapping, torture and death lists just reeks of childish desperation to hoodwink the western public.
It may well be that terrible things will happen if things kick off but that's war.
And the idea that the West doesn't kidnap and torture the enemy is laughable. Rendition, water boarding, targeted assassinations.
China has almost impenetrable western and southern barriers, with no one who could harm them. It is their Pacific front, where they feel hemmed in by western leaning democracies, where they feel vulnerable. Accordingly, they’re addressing that issue now.The thing is if he takes Ukraine then doesn't NATO in Poland at 'Russian' borders now become an issue? Does he then take Poland? But then what about Germany, does he then take Germany....?
Obviously that's silly but it just proves that this NATO expansion argument is rubbish and actually it's just a pretext to reform the ex-Soviet territories under Russia to mask his failings over the last 10 years. The only reason Ukraine and other countries would even entertain NATO membership is because of Russian behaviour.
The Russian economy has contracted by 1/3 since its high prior to 2014. Putin also can't handle the fact that the Eastern bloc is looking westwards and not eastwards for prosperity. We have him over a barrel, he knows it and that's why he's using military posturing to mask that fact.
The wildcard for me is China, Putin has trended towards allying with China but we've yet to see the Chinese position in terms of where they fit into the last 30 years of global powerplays dominated by war in the Middle East. If China did become involved somehow and allied with Russia then we are in for a lot more potential indirect pain then we probably realise at the moment.
So he's literally saying he will not stop until the old Soviet Union is reformed?
While his KGB past is often mentioned he is now blaming Lenin for the creation of Ukraine.All those years of frustration and resentment building in him since Russia lost the Cold War, now he sees the time to avenge the many humiliations he feels they've suffered..
Mussolini, Hitler and the Donald all made of the same crackpot stuff.
But a capitalist version.So he's literally saying he will not stop until the old Soviet Union is reformed?
While his KGB past is often mentioned he is now blaming Lenin for the creation of Ukraine.
I have no idea which historical Russian figure he most identifies with but it would be interesting to know.
Thank you!
Back in the Kremlin internet troll deptWhere have his arse lickers gone?
So he's literally saying he will not stop until the old Soviet Union is reformed?
"They call it Madness"!!!