Regardless of all this, I’m sure it will be our fault!
Everton want full clarification of all this before that agree to it.
Regardless of all this, I’m sure it will be our fault!
It’s a farce - he will have effectively invested 1.5 billion into the club. Which is exactly what we were accused of doing when we got slung out of EuropeHe has written off the loans. How does this work for FFP??
Could another club not do the same. Or are the loan repayments going to the Charity Fund?
Easy way to find out. Let’s get the Sheikh to loan us 1.5 billion then decide he doesn’t want it back. Sure UEFA will be sound with itSurely that debt he’s writing off will still be on books and become payable to the FA as a football debt. No fucking way can it be that easy to circumvent FFP surely? Uefa can’t be that shit incompetent or corrupt can they?
Says Pingu the Penguin, ha ha haHis assets in the uk should be frozen
A debt to the FA why ? It’s his money his debt coming from His money he spent on the club in the way he wanted on the things he wanted for things of Chelsea not for the FA or anyone else what’s a football debt ?Surely that debt he’s writing off will still be on books and become payable to the FA as a football debt. No fucking way can it be that easy to circumvent FFP surely? Uefa can’t be that shit incompetent or corrupt can they?
I understand it to mean he wants whatever he can get for the club and will write the debt off for that to make it more attractive but will only give the money over 1.5 billion and perhaps also the original buying price to Charity He won’t get 1.5 so he won’t give to charityI'm I missing something here ?
He said he doesn't want the 1.5 bil in loans back and any net funds go to the conflict
He bought Chelsea for 140mil and if he gets around 3 bil is he seriously giving up 2.8 billion ?
Football debts are classed as priority like transfer fees owed as example. Chelsea have profited from 1.5bn in loans over his 17 years now going to be written off, do you not think that’s an ffp breach way in excess of influenced sponsorship?A debt to the FA why ? It’s his money his debt coming from His money he spent on the club in the way he wanted on the things he wanted for things of Chelsea not for the FA or anyone else what’s a football debt ?
I'll go halves with you.Maybe I'll buy them
He didn’t say which victims he will donate too. So he will probably give 2.8 billion to RussiaI'm I missing something here ?
He said he doesn't want the 1.5 bil in loans back and any net funds go to the conflict
He bought Chelsea for 140mil and if he gets around 3 bil is he seriously giving up 2.8 billion ?
You’re very cynical, mate ;-)Easy way to find out. Let’s get the Sheikh to loan us 1.5 billion then decide he doesn’t want it back. Sure UEFA will be sound with it
The reports just said 'profits' and didn't go into how that would be calculated, which if I was a journalist would be the first thing I would have wanted to ask to make sense of what I was being told. However what you suggest seems like the most likely scenario.I understand it to mean he wants whatever he can get for the club and will write the debt off for that to make it more attractive but will only give the money over 1.5 billion and perhaps also the original buying price to Charity He won’t get 1.5 so he won’t give to charity
Don’t want the cuntsHe’ll sell to an American and we’ll be in for even more grief
His assets in the uk should be frozen
It’s likely by the time he sells the government would seize the money anyway.
They won’t seize money so publicly going to charity to help Ukraine.
He’s paying to put himself on the right side of history by donating 3Bn he’d never get to keep
Same way he claimed to be part of the peace talks process but wasn’t spotted in any of the videos with the massive delegations from both sides.
If I had to guess he’s probably playing a long game and hoping with the positive press this generates he can get some breathing room to return to London in a few years when this all settles down - he’s not been able to live in london for the last few years due to government crackdowns on the origin of oligarchs money.
The debts will come from past losses so they will already have been accounted for they are not football debt to other clubs they are a debt to himFootball debts are classed as priority like transfer fees owed as example. Chelsea have profited from 1.5bn in loans over his 17 years now going to be written off, do you not think that’s an ffp breach way in excess of influenced sponsorship?