BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 7,562
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Again a mostly sensible post - in contrast to your original bullshit.From my point of view, they dont see EU as an existential threat for them today. If EU countries would up their defense budgets by a large percentage that could certainly change in the future, but today Natos military strength is completely dependent on USA. Nato is basically just an alliance of nations USA protect today. That could of course change in the future, the power balance of the world shift over time. But for Nato to have the same military strength without USA as with USA, most members would basically have to up their defense budget with 500-1000%. As of today Russia knows that no EU country would be foolish enough to attack them, unless they have USA backing them up. They would perhaps think EU might have enough military strength to defend themselves from an attack from them, or at least enough to make it not worth while. But not the strength needed to attack them, making them a existential threat to Russia. USA (or perhaps China) are the only ones who have that strength.
Again just my opinion. What do you agree and disagree with from what I said?
I will however point out this remark of yours as a point of rational departure:
>> As of today Russia knows that no EU country would be foolish enough to attack them, unless they have USA backing them up
WTF? No European nation whatsoever has any designs on attacking anyone. Moreover, USA wouldn't back an attack on Russia even now.
Get a fucking clue, idiot.
Russia has nuclear weapons and ICBMS. No one is going to fucking invade them!
