City’s New Kits

[blueparrot]

Seems the most likely outcome

View attachment 41659

That would be my pick.

 

[AlexWilliamsGloves]

View attachment 41658
Number 2 please, Bob

1 or 4 please Bob

 

[lee_wsm]

Anyone that pays full price for a City shirt needs their head testing. The fakes you can get online haven’t got any defects, they’re pretty much the real thing for fraction of the cost. Football shirts are just another thing for clubs to rip you off with.

On all the ones I have seen the badges always look dodgy normally the text around them can spot them a mile off

 

[Cobwebcat]

View attachment 41658
Number 2 please, Bob

4 best
1 very good
3 Ok
2 Not for me

can someone show what it would look like with white sponsors rather than navy…just to see?

Also the neck looks a bit v shaped instead of rounded on the mock ups.

 

[Bluesince1979]

don't the champions league winners get a gold badge in the centre of the shirt, puma might have to move their logo if we win the champs league

No idea

 

[Cellarite]

View attachment 41658
Number 2 please, Bob

Much as I love navy socks, I have to go for number 1 here.

 

[blueparrot]

Much as I love navy socks, I have to go for number 1 here.

I've never liked navy socks, always look to me like somebody forgot to pack the socks and we had to borrow somebody elses.

 

[Cellarite]

I've never liked navy socks, always look to me like somebody forgot to pack the socks and we had to borrow somebody elses.

They look so right here.

 

[Bozo]

Seems the most likely outcome

View attachment 41659

Mama like.

 

[Bozo]

Anyone that pays full price for a City shirt needs their head testing. The fakes you can get online haven’t got any defects, they’re pretty much the real thing for fraction of the cost. Football shirts are just another thing for clubs to rip you off with.

Would rather give my money to the club that some dodgy overseas retailer.

 

[blueparrot]

View attachment 41663

They look so right here.

Not for me.

 

[mattcity5]

View attachment 41663

They look so right here.

Look great there, but that's a kit without any maroon on it.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

Would rather give my money to the club that some dodgy overseas retailer.

We don’t really give money to the club as such as a lot of it will go to puma, I actually could be wrong there but I thought this was the case. Either way, I spend a fortune on tickets every year so not paying £70 for a bit of blue cloth doesn’t bother me.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

On all the ones I have seen the badges always look dodgy normally the text around them can spot them a mile off

I used to get mine from Thailand when I used to go at Christmas every year, they used to be all spot apart from one which the badge was slightly off, but you could barely tell. I’m pretty sure these fake tops are just cast offs that haven’t past a quality test from the pumas supplier. That’s a conspiracy for you right there!

 

[samarasra]

Anyone that pays full price for a City shirt needs their head testing. The fakes you can get online haven’t got any defects, they’re pretty much the real thing for fraction of the cost. Football shirts are just another thing for clubs to rip you off with.

The fakes are also a rip off and don't benefit the club we support in any way.

 

[Fat Chance]

Is it West Ham away?

 

[Cellarite]

Look great there, but that's a kit without any maroon on it.

I know. That's why I said that although I liked navy socks, I would choose option 1. ;)

 

[Cellarite]

The fakes are also a rip off and don't benefit the club we support in any way.

Charging £70 for an item of clothing that will have expired in 12 months time, and costs less than £10 to make and distribute doesn't benefit the club's supporters in any way.

 

[Legal Alien]

View attachment 41663

They look so right here.

They do look good when the top has navy trim, but i wouldn't have them if we're going with maroon trim

 

[Legal Alien]

Seems the most likely outcome

View attachment 41659

Nice, reminds me of the kits when i was a lad