No matter how good De Ligt had been, no one would pay that, period, and it’s the same here. The clause would only help in negotiating wages. But Raiola is gone. For all we know, we could negotiate a new contract next year with an extension and without a clause IF there is one at all.At the end of the day if the clause did exist, he'd have to be phenomenal for us for someone to come in and pay €200m. Apparently De Ligt (another Raiola client) has one for €120m kicking in this summer but nobody is talking about that because he hasn't been good enough for someone to pay it.
If someone is coming in a few years down the road and paying €200m for him then he's probably won the Balon D'or with us.
Blasphemy! :-)Ibra moved around because he’s so insufferable he made the environment around him at every club so toxic he had no choice but to go after a few years
I am not disputing this. But please investigate the environment he left behind most of those timesGreat player. A proven (league) winner, but never a player to rely on in knock-out stages.
Not really, the club can take payment how they likeIn a post-covid world, can anyone even afford to pay €200,000,000 / £170,000,000 for a player?
Bearing in mind it's a release clause, so 100% is due up front.
PSG are the only club in the world who can pay that IMO. Barcelona and Bayern Munich certainly can't.
Real Madrid are the obvious "threat" but the last time Perez spent €150m on someone it was Hazard and he's been a complete failure.
Not really, the club can take payment how they like
But why now ?Their biggest athlete at their biggest club?
Has it ? Where why ?it has been suggested psg wants to get rid. i for one, would welcome him