Yves Bissouma

lionheart said:
Pep would have been wiser to pay £25m for Bissouma rather than potentially £60m for Phillips. We should hijack Tottenham's deal especially given the way they treated us over Big Harry last summer.
Click to expand...
Would have been the smart move, but the 'case pending' is a big red flag right now..
 
lionheart said:
Pep would have been wiser to pay £25m for Bissouma rather than potentially £60m for Phillips. We should hijack Tottenham's deal especially given the way they treated us over Big Harry last summer.
Click to expand...
Don't think we want any part of another sexual assault investigation.
 
lionheart said:
Pep would have been wiser to pay £25m for Bissouma rather than potentially £60m for Phillips. We should hijack Tottenham's deal especially given the way they treated us over Big Harry last summer.
Click to expand...
We don't do 25m signings. If Brighton had bumped his fees up to 50m then maybe, just maybe we could get in on that but then again, these days 50m doesn't even get our attention anymore.
 
That is a bargain, he's (imo) better than Phillips and more what we need

But that aside, I wouldn't want him at the club for any price....and the club don't need anyone who's currently involved in a sexual assault case
 
If we are going to go down the road of signing or not signing a player based on allegations then we would be in for a long ride, most if not all players have one allegation of some kind of misconduct. At this rate we would be better of going to the Vatican to scout for righteous players but now that I think about it, the Vatican might not really be the best option.
 
Just goes to show you there are bargains out there and 60m for phillips is just unreasonable
 
i♥city said:
If we are going to go down the road of signing or not signing a player based on allegations then we would be in for a long ride, most if not all players have one allegation of some kind of misconduct. At this rate we would be better of going to the Vatican to scout for righteous players but now that I think about it, the Vatican might not really be the best option.
Click to expand...
Awful take. The club have signed players who have issues with misconduct. Grealish for example with the drink driving. But you're not going to sign a player who's under investigation for sexual assault when you have a player on your books who's currently suspended and who's been charged with multiple accounts of sexual assault. I don't think that's difficult to understand.
 
Mr-Mertle said:
Awful take. The club have signed players who have issues with misconduct. Grealish for example with the drink driving. But you're not going to sign a player who's under investigation for sexual assault when you have a player on your books who's currently suspended and who's been charged with multiple accounts of sexual assault. I don't think that's difficult to understand.
Click to expand...

Anyone who calls for the signing of a player who is under investigation for a serious sexual assault has got to be an idiot or wired wrong.
 
i♥city said:
Innocent until proven guilty. I guess the people who came up with that are also "wired wrong"
Click to expand...

City are not a court of law they are a business, he isn't being tried by City but speculating millions on a player that may or may not have issues like that is stupid.

As I said, wired wrong.
 
mexico1970 said:
City are not a court of law they are a business, he isn't being tried by City but speculating millions on a player that may or may not have issues like that is stupid.

As I said, wired wrong.
Click to expand...
By that logic we might as well kick Pep out considering the fact that there are allegations in Spain that he avoided paying taxes, I mean he hasn't been proven guilty, I doubt if he would ever be guilty and I doubt if there's even a case there, its basically just another anti-city propaganda but hey, the magic allegation word was used and well you know the rules, right? One allegation and you are out. So what do you say? do we kick him out or are we all "wired wrong"?
 
i♥city said:
By that logic we might as well kick Pep out considering the fact that there are allegations in Spain that he avoided paying taxes, I mean he hasn't been proven guilty, I doubt if he would ever be guilty and I doubt if there's even a case there but the magic allegation word was used and well you know the rules. One allegation and you are out. So what do you say? or are we all "wired wrong"?
Click to expand...

We are talking about a serious sexual offence here, take yourself round the back and give yourself a talking to immediately.
 
i♥city said:
By that logic we might as well kick Pep out considering the fact that there are allegations in Spain that he avoided paying taxes, I mean he hasn't been proven guilty, I doubt if he would ever be guilty and I doubt if there's even a case there, its basically just another anti-city propaganda but hey, the magic allegation word was used and well you know the rules, right? One allegation and you are out. So what do you say? do we kick him out or are we all "wired wrong"?
Click to expand...

You've chosen a very weird hill to die on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top