On a one year dealDeal is 200m, I've worked out - if the taxi fares from the airport and hairdressers fees are accurate.
Be on Sly in a moment.
On a one year dealDeal is 200m, I've worked out - if the taxi fares from the airport and hairdressers fees are accurate.
Be on Sly in a moment.
To be fair he doesn’t seem to cut his hair at all so that’s 150m off the bill already :oDeal is 200m, I've worked out - if the taxi fares from the airport and hairdressers fees are accurate.
Be on Sly in a moment.
Don't forget the price of his breakfast has to be included as well :)Deal is 200m, I've worked out - if the taxi fares from the airport and hairdressers fees are accurate.
Be on Sly in a moment.
He`d eat the fucker should he go there.They have Shaw!
Might be a good time to remind you that if Zinchenko hadn't come on at half time against Villa we would have lost the league..On the money. He’s always the weak link opposition try to exploit. He’s not a left back and never will be but he’s done a great job covering for a number of years.
And as usual City keep their cards close to their chests.these things are always further down the line behind the scenes than when sky sports fucking news start reporting it! lol
Might be a good time to remind you that if he wasn’t as wank against West Ham we’d have already won the league the previous week.Might be a good time to remind you that if Zinchenko hadn't come on at half time against Villa we would have lost the league..
And as usual City keep their cards close to their chests.
I think "Jackie Get Yer Tits Out" has better ones.How many chests do we have?
![]()
Sky sports news the masters of cleaning up the bottles and glasses after everyones gone to bed.Breaking news on sky city are interested in Marc cucarella!
Talk about late to the party!
You're a better man than me. That 2nd sentence doesn't seem to be written in English.Lol, thanks for clarifying
And in those 3 years, in which the team won plenty, Zinchenko has coped very well. Certainly better than the high value LB we signed.Might be a good time to remind you that if he wasn’t as wank against West Ham we’d have already won the league the previous week.
Zinc isn’t and never will be a left back and he’s done as well as he can over the past few seasons but there are better players out there. We’ve been screaming out for a new LB for 3 years and that shouldn’t change just because he’s a nice bloke and Russia invaded his homeland.
I enjoy watching my side win as much as possible and for as long as that can continue. If that means replacing decent players with better players then so be it.
If/when we buy a LB and Zinchenko stays, he will be the backup and he can do a job there as he's proved before. He's had a lot going on recently and yeah he had a bad game vs west ham, but he hasn't had many and he did redeem himself against villa.Might be a good time to remind you that if he wasn’t as wank against West Ham we’d have already won the league the previous week.
Zinc isn’t and never will be a left back and he’s done as well as he can over the past few seasons but there are better players out there. We’ve been screaming out for a new LB for 3 years and that shouldn’t change just because he’s a nice bloke and Russia invaded his homeland.
I enjoy watching my side win as much as possible and for as long as that can continue. If that means replacing decent players with better players then so be it.
Not a strawman at all. He’s popular because he’s a nice guy and his support has understandably increased since the invasion. But it makes no odds, Pep wants a better LB. Rightly so, he wants us to be the best.And in those 3 years, in which the team won plenty, Zinchenko has coped very well. Certainly better than the high value LB we signed.
Your notion that we keep him for the other reasons you mention is nonsense and to use your favourite phrase, is a bit of a strawman.