carlosthejackal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 4,821
Remember going down to Brighton early 80’s and getting hammered 4-0Totally agree, but you will get hammered for saying the truth, some on here have very short memories.
Remember going down to Brighton early 80’s and getting hammered 4-0Totally agree, but you will get hammered for saying the truth, some on here have very short memories.
yeah the ones that played for 60-70 mins are not featured in todaySo you've an entirely new squad from Saturday then?..
Remember going down there the game before Luton put us down at Maine Road, and we won 1-0 was on the pitch celebrating thought we were safe.....fuck me how wrong could I be!Remember going down to Brighton early 80’s and getting hammered 4-0
They want Brandon from the rags so your 100% correct!I don't know what the Brighton fans are bleating about. If we get Cucu then they will go and do exactly the same thing to a smaller club than them for a replacement. It's football.
More like rescued from the scrap yardGiven you went off.....are you now Cat N?
They’ll be inventing a “derby” with us before you know it, like they did with PalaceWe seem to have become a popular talking shop with our friends from Sussex. That's nice.
I saw them laughing & calling us "MASSIVE!"We don't. I was there in all the bad times, I never saw anyone crying or giving a single fuck about us. It's life.
Not much more to say about the transfer, it will happen or it won’t.I don't know what you're on about pal. I was there when we won the league at Brighton, and they couldn't have been more hospitable for us on the day. It would have been very easy for them to have been hostile and bitter as we were all taking the piss a bit, but they were calm and friendly all day long. I'll always have a soft spot from Brighton for that great day.
They have a player they value highly under contract, we have no right to get this player. If we want to buy him we'll have to pay what Brighton are prepared to sell him for. Let's not act like spoilt brats - like United fans. If we can't do a deal, it is what it is and we need to get over it and move on. Like we did with Kane last summer.
Just because we are rich and successful doesn't mean we can bully other teams into selling their best players. Let's act with class and dignity. Let's not act like Barca/Real/United/Munich. Indeed I think the club act with said dignity when it comes to transfers, but certain elements of the fanbase at times let us all down.
I suspect we will keep trying till the start of the season. else we will change direction and go to germany to get Sosa or someone like it.“This looks on, significant steps forward have been made this week”
Update from my guy….
Cucurella not in Brighton’s squad for friendly today
Imagine if we had gotten Kane. Bayern would have gotten Haaland. So happy we missed out on Kane.I get everyone's reaction to the comments from Potter/Weir, but honestly they probably mean nothing. This one looks like a kane saga to me. Start with a low bid (75m + add ons)- that gets rejected straight away. Get told City sources confident through the whole thing. No real second bid materialises as Brighton/Tottenham make it clear they want stupid money. Brighton/Tottenham sources say City are miles away from an agreement.
I'm not trying to criticise City, I'm pretty sure he's not worth 50m atm. Although could be when considering if we got 5-6 good years out of him or am I saying City can't negotiate- I respect that City set a price and are willing to walk away if a club tries to ask for way above value. I just think there are a lot of parallels. A lot of ITKs reported last year of second bids for Kane and confidence at the City end it would get done. There was a lot of reliance on Kane striking- as I think there is on this deal that Cucurella throws his toys out. I'm not sure that's going to happen tbh. I hope we do go get a different LB if it doesn't materialise.
Well don't walk on it barefoot then. ;)If you want to replicate Brighton beach then it’s not sand, it’s shingle full of sharp bits that’s absolute torture to walk on barefoot.
You could say that again.What I don't get is 16 out of 20 PL clubs voted for, or abstained on a version of FFP with an eye on stopping City. The majority accuse us of ruining football by buying every player with a detectable pulse, & paying the equivalent of the UK's national debt in wages.
The fact that until 12 months ago Arsenal, Chelsea, Dippers & the Rags ALL had higher record purchases than City was lost on most.
We've identified Cucu as a possible acquisition, have made our interest known & have offered to double Brighton's profit 12 months after they bought him.
But no! They want over TREBLE what they paid for him a year ago & yet it's other clubs accusing City of ruining football? :-|
If offering a fair price & selling at fair prices is ruining football, then why isn't the blatant profiteering from a player who wants to leave?
Why aren't the press accusing Brighton of bringing inflation into the transfer market & ruining football?
Why does this only ever seem to apply to City? )(
Good points mate, and worth repeating.What I don't get is 16 out of 20 PL clubs voted for, or abstained on a version of FFP with an eye on stopping City. The majority accuse us of ruining football by buying every player with a detectable pulse, & paying the equivalent of the UK's national debt in wages.
The fact that until 12 months ago Arsenal, Chelsea, Dippers & the Rags ALL had higher record purchases than City was lost on most.
We've identified Cucu as a possible acquisition, have made our interest known & have offered to double Brighton's profit 12 months after they bought him.
But no! They want over TREBLE what they paid for him a year ago & yet it's other clubs accusing City of ruining football? :-|
If offering a fair price & selling at fair prices is ruining football, then why isn't the blatant profiteering from a player who wants to leave?
Why aren't the press accusing Brighton of bringing inflation into the transfer market & ruining football?
Why does this only ever seem to apply to City? )
she might be into the freedom of shoreham nudist beach so not quiet the same as castlefield summer beachBrighton beach is shingle isn’t it?
Remember last season we HAD to pay what Spurs wanted for Kane, 150M and anything less was disrespectful.What I don't get is 16 out of 20 PL clubs voted for, or abstained on a version of FFP with an eye on stopping City. The majority accuse us of ruining football by buying every player with a detectable pulse, & paying the equivalent of the UK's national debt in wages.
The fact that until 12 months ago Arsenal, Chelsea, Dippers & the Rags ALL had higher record purchases than City was lost on most.
We've identified Cucu as a possible acquisition, have made our interest known & have offered to double Brighton's profit 12 months after they bought him.
But no! They want over TREBLE what they paid for him a year ago & yet it's other clubs accusing City of ruining football? :-|
If offering a fair price & selling at fair prices is ruining football, then why isn't the blatant profiteering from a player who wants to leave?
Why aren't the press accusing Brighton of bringing inflation into the transfer market & ruining football?
Why does this only ever seem to apply to City? )(
None of that is relevant. This is a business decision. Not some 'please the fans' kumbaya party. Whether City gets the player or not will come after serious negotiations. How either fans feel here is irrelevant. We'll all be fine ( both City and Brighton fans) no matter the outcome.It is, but why city messing about with the transfer fee, just pay the asking price or move on
does not do both the player and city any good in the media or with Brighton and their fans toward the city fans