It‘d encourage more goals to be scored. I’d give it a chance.Am I the only person who thinks that’s a bollocks rule? I get it if the defender plays it backwards, but if it gets a slight touch off the defender in a pass that otherwise goes where it’s intended, I don’t see why that should negate the offside.
Is that the official pronounciation?Noo-knee-ez really is a grade a prick
Looks like his foot is level with milners foot, and why did they not reverse the angles and spin it round like they normally do?View attachment 54723
Even if you take the arm out of it, his foot is also offside.
Surely even you can’t say this is corruption?!
It’s all we can go off isn’t it mate.The lines are manipulated, look at milners foot and look at van dykes position, why were the lines not twisted round every angle like they are with us l?
Except it doesn’t negate the offside as it wasn’t an intentional touch.The ball came off Milner.
So it's not offside
It will be Firmino….but they’ll start calling him ‘Bobby’ agin when he scoresGoal from Origi? Oh I forgot, he's no longer there.