Gray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 May 2004
- Messages
- 28,861
- Team supported
- ABU & The Bus Wreckers
Still VARed it the utter twats.That should have been a pen even if he didn't trip him.
Ndidi had no intention of playing the ball.
Still VARed it the utter twats.That should have been a pen even if he didn't trip him.
Ndidi had no intention of playing the ball.
And only clear and obvious errors were supposed to be referred to VAR Not judging by this weekend, they aren't.If you have to wait 4 and a half minutes,and struggle to draw CGI lines through the players it is a Goal.
Do you really want goals like that forensically analyzed ?
We once had a Goal disallowed by going back 2 phases of play to cancel it out.It is ridiculous.
The Rag winner was a clear caes of Offside as you will ever seen.It didnt even need lines,just looking at the Grass cuts was all that was needed.
IndeedyNdidi done up like a kipper there.
Yeah I do agree with that.
I don’t mind human error too much because they still got the vast majority of decisions correct without VAR. Football is about goals, and while to the letter of the law that Brighton goal was correctly chalked off for offside. If the linesman had seen it with his eyes at full speed and he disallowed it, fair enough; if he missed it, it’s not the end of the world.
I think VAR shouldn’t be allowed to be used for goals. It should be for penalties or red cards only for me.
Celebrating goals and the game in general, isn’t as special as it was pre-VAR.
Good enough for City post Pep?He deserves it. They play great football.
Yeah I do agree with that.
I don’t mind human error too much because they still got the vast majority of decisions correct without VAR. Football is about goals, and while to the letter of the law that Brighton goal was correctly chalked off for offside. If the linesman had seen it with his eyes at full speed and he disallowed it, fair enough; if he missed it, it’s not the end of the world.
I think VAR shouldn’t be allowed to be used for goals. It should be for penalties or red cards only for me.
Celebrating goals and the game in general, isn’t as special as it was pre-VAR.
Just awful.Exactly,it kills the enjoyment of a goal celebration. You’re always waiting to see if it’s allowed. It’s terrible for the game.
Very good!Indeedy
Watched Chelsea first half, Newcastle second half yesterday - not a bloody goal to be seen.He deserves it. They play great football.
VAR won't solve this if it's improperly applied.It sounds like you would be happy to get rid of var.
Would you be as happy when a ref gave a blatant offside goal to the rags in the next Derby.
Then the linesman flagged a wrongly awarded offside to chalk off our equaliser.
I wouldn't.
And only clear and obvious errors were supposed to be referred to VAR Not judging by this weekend, they aren't.
VAR won't solve this if it's improperly applied.
watched Newcastle yesterday and they were roobed of a good goal by var only showing one camera angle and not the other side where it was clear he was pushed... just sillyWatched Chelsea first half, Newcastle second half yesterday - not a bloody goal to be seen.
This game 6 goals and twenty minutes still to play, most enjoyable.
100% agree.Exactly. It's just a bunch of twats in a van looking for any excuse to chalk off goals. Looking for a single frame, a single pixel of a players boot to rule out a goal. It sucks any excitement out of goals because you have to wait for it to be checked first.