Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
BigOscar said:
Really? He literally drags Kevs standing leg foot about half a foot, while he's spinning. It's am incredibly obvious penalty. Are people just watching that one deliberately shit angle and basing if off that? As from the other angle it's very obvious
Click to expand...
lol ok

Around the 11-14 seconds mark.



like I said I don't give a fuck, 3 points thanks very much but let's not be scouse or raggish and pretend it wasn't a dive after a brush of contact.
 
bluealf said:
I am one of the most biased blues there is but if you can't see that KDB flung himself to the ground after feeling a brush on his foot then I don't know what film you have been watching.

Now I don't give a fuck because Saleh has been throwing himself to the ground for years, as have others, we have also been denied clear cut penalties from vicious tackles in the box ie Aguero's near leg breaker, so again I don't give a fuck that KDB span and flung himself to the floor.

But please don't pretend he booted him over, the foot brushed the back of his foot and 2 seconds later KDB spins and drops.

Fantastic 3 points in the bag and a load of piss boiled from the scouse cunts
Click to expand...

He twisted and fell! You watch the Fulham player at normal speed he was coming in pretty quickly it wasn’t like he was stood there and stuck his foot at the ball and clipped Kdb ankle he came in with pace. Def penalty because no such thing as a soft pen it’s either a foul or not! I’d be saying the Same if it was at the other end
 
bluealf said:
lol ok

Around the 11-14 seconds mark.



like I said I don't give a fuck, 3 points thanks very much but let's not be scouse or raggish and pretend it wasn't a dive after a brush of contact.
Click to expand...

Contact with player not ball. Defender didn’t need to put his foot in. Always risk of a pen in that situation. I will always remember the keeper wiping out Foden. Clear pen not given.

The crying is great tho -:)
 
bluealf said:
lol ok

Around the 11-14 seconds mark.



like I said I don't give a fuck, 3 points thanks very much but let's not be scouse or raggish and pretend it wasn't a dive after a brush of contact.
Click to expand...


I wouldn't say a dive, I would say he's exaggerated contact to get the penalty.

Only because it is a foul, every team would want a penalty for that but it's the type of situation where you don't get a penalty if you don't go down.
 
bluealf said:
lol ok

Around the 11-14 seconds mark.



like I said I don't give a fuck, 3 points thanks very much but let's not be scouse or raggish and pretend it wasn't a dive after a brush of contact.
Click to expand...


The angle from behind shows he actually takes a bit of a boot into the back of his leg. You’ve yet to present this evidence and are instead posting videos distorted by rag/scouse words.
 
There was an incident in the Forest vs Brentford game yesterday where a Brentford defender makes contact with a Forest attacker in the penalty area which was far harder than the tackle on Kev. It was checked by VAR and deemed no penalty presumably because the contact was deemed insufficient to merit an award. There were two other similar incidents in the game where Brentford got the benefit of the doubt of insufficient contact for a penalty.
I would say we got the benefit of some inconsistent soft refereeing here wrt the penalty.
Like a few other punters on here who feel the same as as me, I don't give a fcuk and was delighted with the win but I'm not going to view the incident with blue tinted specs.
Other days decisions will go against us.
 
argyle said:
Just reading some of the Arsenal twitter blueticks and the comments saying Match of the Day skipped past the KDB 'dive' because they hate Arsenal and City are the chosen team and there is an agenda for us.

Not just City fans on here wearing tin foil hats.
Click to expand...

Fuck them. See scousers complaining as well, yet the only reason the penalty was awarded was because the officials knew it would help the scouse 9th place battle with Fulham. Biased refereeing in favour of Liverpool yet again.
 
HelloCity said:
The angle from behind shows he actually takes a bit of a boot into the back of his leg. You’ve yet to present this evidence and are instead posting videos distorted by rag/scouse words.
Click to expand...
I said he got a brush on his foot, it looked soft as fuck in real time while watching the game, I do not need to present any evidence of this as I said he dived after he felt a touch, guess what a bit of a boot in the back of the leg is?

A touch.

I posted that video as it directly contradicts the other guy saying KDB had his leg swept back a foot.

I knocked the sound off as the image was all that was required unless that was doctored by the scouse/rags as well
 
Last edited:
MCFC1993 said:
I wouldn't say a dive, I would say he's exaggerated contact to get the penalty.

Only because it is a foul, every team would want a penalty for that but it's the type of situation where you don't get a penalty if you don't go down.
Click to expand...
I'm not arguing against that though.
 
BigOscar said:
So, yes, you are using the terrible angle rather than the one that clearly shows the foul
Click to expand...
Clearly shows that his feet were back on the ground and not swept while spinning as you claimed though.

Put it to bed, you win, you're the bigger blue than me, well done, take your award and enjoy Sunday.
 
bluealf said:
Clearly shows that his feet were back on the ground and not swept while spinning as you claimed though.

Put it to bed, you win, you're the bigger blue than me, well done, take your award and enjoy Sunday.
Click to expand...
No, it doesn't,you just can't see what happened because the angle messes up the perspective. Just watch the other angle, it's clear as day. He puts his foot down, then gets kicked, dragging his standing foot back 6 inches, si he can't drive off it. You can't see that on your crappie angle as the foot gets dragged straight towards the camera.
 
BringBackSwales said:
71% possession, 16 shots to 4, yet the mulfcbbc have Fulham down as “will be disappointed”. I’ll tell you what Fulham were, they were defensive, diving, cheating, time wasting, spoiling cunts, who eventually got what they deserved, fuck all
Click to expand...

Being disappointed and getting what you deserve aren’t mutually exclusive. I’m pretty sure there hasn’t been a football match played anywhere in the world, ever, where a team conceding a 95 th minute winner haven’t been left disappointed.
 
Stephen230 said:
Being disappointed and getting what you deserve aren’t mutually exclusive. I’m pretty sure there hasn’t been a football match played anywhere in the world, ever, where a team conceding a 95 th minute winner haven’t been left disappointed.
Click to expand...

Their disappointment should have been with their team who showed not an ounce of willing against 10 men.
 
bluealf said:
I said he got a brush on his foot, it looked soft as fuck in real time while watching the game, I do not need to present any evidence of this as I said he dived after he felt a touch, guess what a bit of a boot in the back of the leg is?

A touch.

I posted that video as it directly contradicts the other guy saying KDB had his leg swept back a foot.

I knocked the sound off as the image was all that was required unless that was doctored by the scouse/rags as well
Click to expand...
But a foul is a foul and it was in the box, so guess what?…..penalty. It doesn’t matter if KDB was a bit dramatic. I say, good for him, because if he’d not gone down, we’d all be complaining about the non-decision. Oh, and how many of Fulham’s players complained to the ref?…..yeah, none.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top