United Thread - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
None of us know what financial pressure the Glazers are under within their wider business or what impact recent moves in currency values and interest rates have had on their liquid assets. Or Covid. Or fuel prices.

Any attempt to second guess this announcement can only be speculation but it is perfectly feasible that they are selling because they have no choice.
I thought those boys were from Florida, what fuel costs, its f**king freezing in Pickering today ;-)
Hope them Glazer boys can hang on for a couple of years :-)
 
That is essentially a propaganda article for Saudi Arabia from Dan Roan who has spent the last decade writing vile and biased articles about our owner. Also bear in mind that Abu Dhabi is one of the most liberal regimes in the entire Middle East, especially compared to Saudi. So why has Roan and his BBC pals been so selective and vicious with his coverage of City?
 
Maybe the Barron Knights will finally put a bid in. The dips and rags want to sell at the top of the market but I don’t see many buyers when the only way is down (From a financial POV). When the wankers in the media talk about City and Newcastle, they conveniently ignore we were bought for £200m and £300m respectively. If either club is sold anytime soon, the owners would make millions if not billions.
 
That is essentially a propaganda article for Saudi Arabia from Dan Roan who has spent the last decade writing vile and biased articles about our owner. Also bear in mind that Abu Dhabi is one of the most liberal regimes in the entire Middle East, especially compared to Saudi. So why has Roan and his BBC pals been so selective and vicious with his coverage of City?
Cause City actually win things. Roan and Stone are cunts.
 
But Apple would sell 1.1 billion phones over night. That’s how many United fans there are according to United and their media whores.

How makes fakes would Apple be able to produce ?

Rag fans generally buy ( or pinch ) snide shirts and other copy rag gear off the markets .
 
Last edited:
Nobody in Dubai will go near United or Liverpool, gentleman agreements with Abu Dhabi.

Meta and Amazon can't and won't.

It will be Ratcliffe at similar monies to what he offered to do at Chelsea, or an American hedge fund daft enough to put Beckham and Tom Brady as the figureheads.

Ratcliffe wasn't offering Chelsea any more money for transfers than United have already splurged, and he wanted to spread it over years.

He knows he can build up the asset with infrastructure spending.
If Brady signs up for this, he is fucking dead to me. But he probably will. Bad enough that he plays for Tampa now. For the Glazers...
(Just for clarity, I live about a ten minute walk from Gillette stadium where old Tom B plied his excellent trade for the Patriots for nigh on 20 years...) I have seen him play so many times...
So he will be a major **** if he is part of a legitimate takeover of that shower.
 
If Brady signs up for this, he is fucking dead to me. But he probably will. Bad enough that he plays for Tampa now. For the Glazers...
(Just for clarity, I live about a ten minute walk from Gillette stadium where old Tom B plied his excellent trade for the Patriots for nigh on 20 years...) I have seen him play so many times...
So he will be a major **** if he is part of a legitimate takeover of that shower.
He followed me from Natck to Tampa ;)
 
The club could have sacked him for gross misconduct after that interview but the twat could appeal.......
The club have probably spoke with his agent and said "let.him go and play for another club on the same wages...."
The agent is happy as he gets a cut of the new deal and Ronaldo doesn't lose a penny as will just be being paid by someone else
He should siiuuuu them.
 
That is essentially a propaganda article for Saudi Arabia from Dan Roan who has spent the last decade writing vile and biased articles about our owner. Also bear in mind that Abu Dhabi is one of the most liberal regimes in the entire Middle East, especially compared to Saudi. So why has Roan and his BBC pals been so selective and vicious with his coverage of City?

Because he's a ****, and City have banned him from the ground in the past.

Roan like most of the media whores has chosen to attack City as a way of getting his clickbait, probably from rag and dipper fuckwits.

Not sure but I think he is head of BBC Sport , which if true explains his approach to City. BBC Sports, Roan and his staff are all cunts who tow the party line.

Rags and Dippers are their target market.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top