PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

argyle said:
ke5j80jbc-lg.jpg
Click to expand...
He found out Moonbeam was on a retainer from Al Jazira.
 
Gone for a Burton said:
Khaldoon is one of the brightest, substantial men on the planet.

One of HH Sheikh Mansour’s closest and most trusted advisers.

He has access to to Kings, Heads of State, Royal Families, Ambassadors,Banks, Financiers and elite businessmen globally.

His integrity and reputation is beyond question and he won’t have risked a lifetime of credit to cook City’s books.

“ Clear & Obvious - Once and for all”
Click to expand...
He also has access to a shit hot intelligence operation in AD.
 
Tolmie scores said:
Its such an obvious Red Brigarde move, id say let em have it. Id prefer the Conference or wherever. When teams realise they cant out manouvre these three as their revenues will dwarf say a Bournemouth (plus Chelsk which they will grin and bear) surely they will get fed up as well and challenge status quo...or maybe not, 70, 's 80's 90's 2000's on wards only handful of teams have won the top div in 50 years..and everyone put up with it...12 teams in 72 years
Click to expand...
Let's keep upsetting the status quo. The more competition in football the better.
 
Akiva said:
Sickened they are using our club to peddle their own interests, cheered on by the media and our bent as fuck rivals (not good enough to beat us on the park) alongside their smooth brained fans.

They don't have anything tangible here at all, if even half these allegations were real it would be an issue for HMRC. There'd be criminal prosecutions. Seizing of assets. Interviews. More.

It's all a farce, a last roll of the dice to stop City and ensure the "top 6" get what they feel is due. And they've already accomplished what they set out to - they know this shit won't stick in court, not with a literal army of lawyers and a blank check against it, but they've yet again shifted the narrative on to City and created the illusion of long term instability for the club.

But then, we should be used to this, yeah? The media have been downplaying our achievements since we started achieving. Every last wanker associated with the Rags and the bin dipping Scousers has long since given up pretending like their shite clubs are good enough to beat us at actual football. The PL knows full well the weight of both and has been trying to sink us for years, you just have to watch our matches every week and it's the same fucking story. City vs 12 men.

No more. Bring down the drawbridges, fuck the media off from our ground and let's stop pretending any of our rivals aren't trying to knife us. When the rags shat the bed against the gooners a few weeks ago, predictably, I saw a few round here actually cheering on those twats from the Swamp. Enough.

CTID.
Click to expand...
You had me at ‘smooth brained fans’.

haha, well said.
 
halfcenturyup said:
Question btw. Is this independent commission supposed to come up with the penalties if any charges are upheld? How does that work?
Click to expand...
I think it'll be decided between dessert and coffee at an upstate NY restaurant during a dinner meeting between the glazers, turkey neck and kronke.
 
Big Dave Watson said:
Just want to throw this one out there.

Over the past few days I have read numerous posts saying “I couldn’t sleep last night…..” etc so just wondering if ‘when’ City are exonerated could fans go after the Premier League for causing unecessary personal stress and anxiety?

Just curious, can any legal experts out there answer this?
Click to expand...
What about alcoholism?
We've had that much success I've become an alcy.
Surely I can sue
 
hammocity said:
I was going to try and explain it to you but then I thought fuck it, if you doesn't realise the effect supporting a club has on some people it's probably not worth my effort.
Click to expand...

I don't see what this has to do with anything. Whatever the effect of supporting a club has on you, the suggestion that you can sue the Premier League for those feelings is still ridiculous.
 
KS55 said:
I am suing Pep for making me despair at his CL final selection, I am suing whoever chose that Opal fruits strip, I am suing Pearce for half a season with no goals, I am suing Fowler for missing that pen, I am suing big Mal for breaking up a decent side and replacing it with Barry Conlon etc………
Click to expand...

You mean Starburst you old codger
 
KS55 said:
Reason is, we have been here before. We know the form.
1. UEFA investigatory chamber found us guilty but CAS, inter alia, said “City cannot hope to get a fair hearing while M.Leterme is in the chair”
He stayed in the chair. He was an ex director of Bayern, one of our accusers.
2. UEFA’s evidence consisted of Der Spiegel‘s version of some emails. Those mails were shown to have been manipulated by Der Spiegel. In any case, emails are evidence of a conversation but not of the action alleged. If I email you saying I am having an affair with Suzie Dent, that is not evidence that I am doing so. UEFA were warned in advance, but they carried on. Many of the PL’s charges are based on these emails, plus an extra one already shown to be forged.
3. UEFA’s attempt to recreate our accounts was done by a serving director of ManU.
4. The investigatory chamber included Rick Parry ex CEO of Liverpool, with still strong connections there. His long term contact proceeded to report confidential info in the New York Times. UEFA promised an Enquiry but never did it.
5. Ceferin, secretary general if UEFA tried twice to do a deal: pay a fine for non co-operation and we will drop the charges. He was told to do one.
6. The directors of Liverpool and MU have a nickname for CFG’s chief exec….the terrorist.
7. Liverpool sent a round robin to UEFA, signed by nine clubs, saying we should be banned before due process was complete.
8. Arsenal several years ago authored a round robin urging the PL to enforce their rules against us.
9. The PL Commission will be chaired by a man with strong Arsenal connections.
10. Our chairman maintains that this is a conspiracy “clear and organised” and that we will refute all allegations.
11. Many of the PL’s charges are based on non compliance with UEFA rules of which we have already been cleared. Are we to be retried for the same offences?
In the light of all this, and many other factors, we prefer to believe our club rather than a set of self serving wankers.
12. CAS ruled that the charge that our accounts were not a true and fair picture was fantasy, requiring a very wide conspiracy of hundreds of people who all kept quiet.
Click to expand...

My man.
 
MarsLlama said:
I don't see what this has to do with anything. Whatever the effect of supporting a club has on you, the suggestion that you can sue the Premier League for those feelings is still ridiculous.
Click to expand...
They should put a warning label on the broadcasts:

Watching these games and refereeing performances can be hazardous to the health of City fans.
 
Every sordid extra marital affair, every brown envelope bung, every drunken dalliance, every tap up, every once assumed private old boys and media conversation etc. are in our "arsenal". Going to be a very interesting few months as the whole house of shit could come crashing down now. They've really opened the can now and will regret it. Will be a few nervous protagonists right now.
Going to get a lot of popcorn in and watch the car crash and/or the hilarious backtracking.
 
If this independent panel is going to be held with integrity as they say….can we have 3 city fans on it?
 
KS55 said:
Reason is, we have been here before. We know the form.
1. UEFA investigatory chamber found us guilty but CAS, inter alia, said “City cannot hope to get a fair hearing while M.Leterme is in the chair”
He stayed in the chair. He was an ex director of Bayern, one of our accusers.
2. UEFA’s evidence consisted of Der Spiegel‘s version of some emails. Those mails were shown to have been manipulated by Der Spiegel. In any case, emails are evidence of a conversation but not of the action alleged. If I email you saying I am having an affair with Suzie Dent, that is not evidence that I am doing so. UEFA were warned in advance, but they carried on. Many of the PL’s charges are based on these emails, plus an extra one already shown to be forged.
3. UEFA’s attempt to recreate our accounts was done by a serving director of ManU.
4. The investigatory chamber included Rick Parry ex CEO of Liverpool, with still strong connections there. His long term contact proceeded to report confidential info in the New York Times. UEFA promised an Enquiry but never did it.
5. Ceferin, secretary general if UEFA tried twice to do a deal: pay a fine for non co-operation and we will drop the charges. He was told to do one.
6. The directors of Liverpool and MU have a nickname for CFG’s chief exec….the terrorist.
7. Liverpool sent a round robin to UEFA, signed by nine clubs, saying we should be banned before due process was complete.
8. Arsenal several years ago authored a round robin urging the PL to enforce their rules against us.
9. The PL Commission will be chaired by a man with strong Arsenal connections.
10. Our chairman maintains that this is a conspiracy “clear and organised” and that we will refute all allegations.
11. Many of the PL’s charges are based on non compliance with UEFA rules of which we have already been cleared. Are we to be retried for the same offences?
In the light of all this, and many other factors, we prefer to believe our club rather than a set of self serving wankers.
12. CAS ruled that the charge that our accounts were not a true and fair picture was fantasy, requiring a very wide conspiracy of hundreds of people who all kept quiet.
Click to expand...
Nah must of done something -:)

Well said, sums up the situation nicely.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top