PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I'm sure, but even so, making incredibly serious charges that you are almost certain to lose is bizarre behaviour even if the redshirts are baying for it.
the premier league has nothing to lose , they think we are guilty,when we are acquitted that's the end of it(until the next one),we wont sue ,because is there anything to sue for
 
You make a good point. The narrative is set if you say things often enough regardless of what the truth is. The CAS judgment remains a trove of positive and negative detail of the case, City's defence and the result. It is very illuminating especially in respect of City's own submissions against the severe allegations made there but people don't seem to take the time to actually read it.
The whole media stance has been disgraceful, full of lies and inaccuracies which City did nothing to combat and so are now widely believed.
Some examples:
—Mat Syed wrote two articles in the Times based on the idea that the emails proved our guilt. Of course, he had never even seen the emails, let alone understood their lack of cogency.
—The Guardian carried an article which concluded with: “City were cleared on a technicality by a corruptible body.”
—The Guardian maintained that City had regular injections of funding from the AbuDhabi wealth fund, no evidence sited of course.
—Henry Winter wrote that “although City have been cleared, they are not innocent.” He wrote this before CAS had published their reasoning.
— The clearance only because of the time barred items was repeated ad infinitum across the whole media.
And so on and so forth.
This is why I posted that this time round we must take action against anyone blithely ignoring the verdict and the ratio decidendI.
 
The other crucial point is whether Pinto was a Robin Hood whistle-blower, or merely a hacker & thief who sold his ill-gotten gains on.

Did Pinto REALLY hack City because he could?

Did Pinto hack City because he was truly concerned about our criminality? If so, why?

OR, did he do it purely for monetary gain? If so, did he hack City to sell-on the data, or was he engaged by a third party to get dirt on City?
Theres a lot more to Pinto's hack than just City, found this article the other day having had similar thoughts. Worth a read.

 
Was there not at some point previously a non match official in the var box, someone associated with PL who shouldn’t have been there. I may be wrong but it does suggest 3rd party involvement in var is possible.
 
Don’t know if anyone has said but I used to have a shred of respect for True Geordie, biggest game of the season Arsenal vs City and he has no city fan on. Show has gone down hill for various reasons… brings on Craig from Anfield “AGENDA”. No city fan to talk about charges while, they talk with absolutely no idea what they’re on about, this well I’m not gonna say what Craig is I think we all know, abysmal.


You lost me after "I used to have a shred of respect for True Geordie"! ...WHY, he's an absolute cnut!
 
Don’t really understand how anyone could be in the ref’s ear apart from the match officials and Stockley Park. And could this voice have been dubbed on afterwards to make the recording “interesting”?
It's easy.... have you never been on a group call in a meeting for example?
The ref's earpiece obviously works on some frequency, you could have multiple people connected and they don't have to be in the same room.
 
This - as far as I know - has never been answered.
Let's face it, if he wanted to hack a club for the exposure or for blackmail/monetary gain, why City? Surely the G14 clubs would have been a better target?
He's obviously been hired by somebody to target us specifically - I don't believe it was random... we need to find out who!
Unfortunately it is irrelevant as far as our case goes. The emails are in the public arena, however they got there…
 
Don’t know if anyone has said but I used to have a shred of respect for True Geordie, biggest game of the season Arsenal vs City and he has no city fan on. Show has gone down hill for various reasons… brings on Craig from Anfield “AGENDA”. No city fan to talk about charges while, they talk with absolutely no idea what they’re on about, this well I’m not gonna say what Craig is I think we all know, abysmal.


The level of mental illness there is actually really sad to see.
 
Well yes, but I haven’t been in a meeting with unauthorised eavesdroppers or gatecrashers. As far as I know.
 
@M18CTID - appreciate your comments (and the character verification!).

When I was told this yesterday, I reacted in the way most on here have. A mixture of disbelief and laughter if I'm honest. After 40 years of supporting City and hearing every conceivable terrace conspiracy theory known to man, it was going to be filed with the rest, but when it became obvious that the guy I was talking to was deadly serious and there was more to this than a simple conspiracy theory, I started to take an interest. He mentioned a couple of names who could "verify" his claims, one of whom I spoke to and I was told exactly the same thing. I'm also aware that a reasonably well known City twitter account has the same information. I'm not some wet behind the ears snotty-nosed kid, I'm what is commonly known on these pages as an FOC. A typical Mancunian cynic in all things in life, don't seek the limelight and I'm generally apathetic to stuff like this. However, in MY opinion, there is substance to this and anyone who thinks it isn't possible that such a conversation took place (and was recorded) is living in the dark ages.

Anyway, I just want to clarify a couple of things:

There's a very big difference between blackmail and leverage.
The recording wasn't obtained by surreptitious means in any way linked to the Club, whether that be by Middle Eastern special forces, Chinese weather balloons or MI5. It has been handed to the club by a third party.
The intervening "voice" on the recording was not part of the matchday on field team, not a member of the VAR team and not the matchday commander.
The on field referee received an instruction from the intervening voice, who allegedly used the phrase "levelling up".
The "dossier" I mentioned in my original email is my take on things, I have not suggested that the club has one, I'm simply expressing my opinion, although I'd be amazed if they didn't have one.
The club who have distanced themselves from the Nasty 9 is Burnley.

By posting what I did yesterday, I knew I was potentially setting myself up to be a laughing stock, accused of being a raving lunatic, a complete & utter fantasist. My PM's cover all those bases, trust me. Each to their own, I've got broad shoulders. But ask yourself this...why would a perfectly normal, regular Joe City fan, put himself through the ringer like this, if he wasn't confident in the information he was given?

Yes, it could be bullshit, but then again, it could very well be true. There's many, many scandals over the years that were scarcely believable at the time. Scandals that would never have seen the light of day but for the meanderings of some FOC on a faceless platform.

Is football in this country as squeaky clean as they'd have you believe? Yeah....right, sure it is.

The truth will out.

Up the fucking Blues.
That puts the cat amongst the pigeons. I had discounted this tale until now. In my own mind I concluded that the only way for this to be true was if the conversation included words such as “you know the instructions, rule against City as often as you can.” Wow, and there the words are.
Who gave instructions to level up?
 
im not brilliant with tech, but if you had 5 million emails on your data base ,if you typed in the words manchester city in your search tool that would bring up the emails you were looking at, someone has got hold of the guy that hacked all those things and asked him to search for our emails, hes been put up to it, and it wouldn't surprise me if he got paid to do it, be nice in his trial if it came out

Don’t think it works that way when you hack someone you receive it in different format I believe!
 
That puts the cat amongst the pigeons. I had discounted this tale until now. In my own mind I concluded that the only way for this to be true was if the conversation included words such as “you know the instructions, rule against City as often as you can.” Wow, and there the words are.
Who gave instructions to level up?
Don't knock Conspiracy theorists, they've got a lot of stuff 100% correct in the past 3 years.
 
Yep:

There's been a few of the usual suspects (Tanja(sp), Delaney et al) who have been lauding him for being a whistle-blower, I wonder if they'll just pretend it never happened or if they'll backtrack?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top