Now that really is a ridiculous decision.
I respectfully disagree. The upper echelons of the bbc are filled with and by the tories. I think your political leaning is clouding your judgement on this issue.As someone who has many friends working in it, I'd say no.
It's like when rivals fans argue their team is being victimised by referees or the media.
People see what they they want to see and the fact is a lot of my friends have a daily task trying to prove they are impartial in their jobs and it is neither of red or blue persuasion.
Lineker has continued to his colleague no favours, many who are actually proper journalists and have made numerous complaints to management about him.
He also said used in the 1930s ie before the war and the Holocaust when it was just pointing the fingers at certain groups of people to make others dislike them, not actively undertaking genocide. A bit like the Daily Mail, black footballers and cars/shops - you don't necessarily say it yourself, you just lead enough people to draw the conclusion you want.He didn't directly compare the conservatives to Nazi's.
He said their language used about migrants was reminiscent.
Bravermans language this week certainly was.
Horrible bastard, really, WHY ?
Now that really is a ridiculous decision.
He doesn't front an impartial institution. Last time I checked that was the BBC chairman; a man who is currently embroiled in a financial scandal involving the ruling political party of this country; that impartial enough for you?
Linekar is a sports presenter and should be allowed to voice his opinion on the grossly offensive language our government have attached to their immigration policy.
Well I will miss both of them! Their knowledge and their humour compared to some and, as a woman I hate to say this, especially most of the women pundits is great.Neither will be missed.
1 to go.
I respectfully disagree. The upper echelons of the bbc are filled with and by the tories. I think your political leaning is clouding your judgement on this issue.
He never suggested the Tories are comparable to the actions of the Nazis. He highlighted the tone of the rhetoric and how it was bottom rung of the dehumanising propaganda ladder; which is correct. Our home secretary shouldn't be using words like "swarm" and "invasion" to describe refugees, especially when many are fleeing persecution.In making the tone deaf comparison to people who exterminated six million Jews and many millions more, he puts the Tories on a similar footing.
He makes the Nazi rhetoric sound trivial and, while the refugee crisis is anything but, it is in a different stratosphere to the deliberate policy of extermination.
Fiona Bruce has the demeanour of the jolly-hockey-sticks,private school Head Girl about her.She is the up-to-date Jill Dando and can do no wrong,whereas Lineker is a jug-eared twonk who is not even that good at his job.Well done Lineker and Wrighty. If the likes of Fiona Bruce can get away with her remarks actually on the BBC when Gary L’s were on Twitter then the BBC is showing its prejudice. IMHO
He should have referred to U.K. policy in the 30s when we turned away boatloads of refugees from Germany.In making the tone deaf comparison to people who exterminated six million Jews and many millions more, he puts the Tories on a similar footing.
He makes the Nazi rhetoric sound trivial and, while the refugee crisis is anything but, it is in a different stratosphere to the deliberate policy of extermination.